Dear MARMAM community,

On behalf of all co-authors, I am happy to share this new publication in 
Frontiers in Marine Science on evaluating strategies for managing anthropogenic 
mortality on marine mammals.

It also case studies harbour porpoise bycatch in the North Sea and has a direct 
application in the upcoming OSPAR Quality Status Report 2023. On top, it is 
introducing a neat R-package to carry out management strategy evaluation of 
control rules to set removal limits in marine mammal conservation.


Genu M, Gilles A, Hammond PS, Macleod K, Paillé J, Paradinas I, Smout S, 
Winship AJ and Authier M (2021) Evaluating Strategies for Managing 
Anthropogenic Mortality on Marine Mammals: An R Implementation With the Package 
RLA. Front. Mar. Sci. 8:795953. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.795953 
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.795953/full


Abstract:

Bycatch, the undesirable and non-intentional catch of non-target species in 
marine fisheries, is one of the main causes of mortality of marine mammals 
worldwide. When quantitative conservation objectives and management goals are 
clearly defined, computer-based procedures can be used to explore likely 
population dynamics under different management scenarios and estimate the 
levels of anthropogenic removals, including bycatch, that marine mammal 
populations may withstand. Two control rules for setting removal limits are the 
Potential Biological Removal (PBR) established under the US Marine Mammal 
Protection Act and the Removals Limit Algorithm (RLA) inspired from the Catch 
Limit Algorithm (CLA) developed under the Revised Management Procedure of the 
International Whaling Commission. The PBR and RLA control rules were tested in 
a Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE) framework. A key feature of PBR and RLA 
is to ensure conservation objectives are met in the face of the multiple 
uncertainties or biases that plague real-world data on marine mammals. We built 
a package named RLA in the R software to carry out MSE of control rules to set 
removal limits in marine mammal conservation. The package functionalities are 
illustrated by two case studies carried out under the auspices of the Oslo and 
Paris convention (OSPAR) (the Convention for the Protection of the Marine 
Environment of the North-East Atlantic) Marine Mammal Expert Group (OMMEG) in 
the context of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive. The first case study 
sought to tune the PBR control rule to the conservation objective of restoring, 
with a probability of 0.8, a cetacean population to 80% of carrying capacity 
after 100 years. The second case study sought to further develop a RLA to set 
removals limit on harbor porpoises in the North Sea with the same conservation 
objective as in the first case study. Estimation of the removals limit under 
the RLA control rule was carried out within the Bayesian paradigm. Outputs from 
the functions implemented in the package RLA allows the assessment of 
user-defined performance metrics, such as time to reach a given fraction of 
carrying capacity under a given level of removals compared to the time needed 
given no removals.


Best wishes,

Anita


--
    Dr. Anita Gilles
    University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
    Institute for Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife Research (ITAW)
    Werftstr. 6 | 25761 Büsum
    Germany
    Phone: +49 (0)511-8568177
    Fax: +49 (0)511-8568181
    [email protected]
   
https://www.tiho-hannover.de/en/itaw/beschaeftigte/beschaeftigte-buesum/anita-gilles
_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to