Greetings MARMAM Community,

On behalf of my co-authoers, I am excited to share our recent publication in 
Frontiers in Marine Science:


Torres, L.G., Bird, C.N, Rodrigues-Gonzáles, F., Christiansen F., Bejder, L., 
Lemos, L., Urbán Ramírez, J., Swartz, S., Willoughby, A., Hewitt., J., 
Bierlich, K.C. (2022). Range-wide comparison of gray whale body condition 
reveals contrasting sub-population health characteristics and vulnerability to 
environmental change. Frontiers in Marine Science. 9:867258. 
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.867258


Abstract: Climate change is a global phenomenon, yet impacts on resource 
availability to predators may be spatially and temporally diverse and 
asynchronous. As capital breeders, whales are dependent on dense, predictable 
prey resources during foraging seasons. An Unusual Mortality Event (UME) of 
Eastern North Pacific (ENP) gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) was declared in 
2019 due to a dramatic rise in stranded animals, many emaciated. Climate change 
impacts may have affected prey availability on the primary foraging grounds of 
ENP gray whales (~20,000 individuals) in the Arctic and sub-Arctic region and 
in coastal habitats between northern California, USA and British Columbia, 
Canada where a small sub-group of ENP whales called the Pacific Coast Feeding 
Group (PCFG; ~230 individuals) forages. To investigate variability of gray 
whale body condition relative to changing ocean conditions, we compare two 
datasets of gray whale aerial photogrammetry images collected via Unoccupied 
Aircraft Systems (UAS) on the ENP wintering grounds in San Ignacio Lagoon, 
Mexico (SIL; n=111) and on the PCFG feeding grounds in Oregon, USA (n=72) over 
the same three-year period (2017–2019). We document concurrent body condition 
improvement of PCFG whales in Oregon while body condition of whales in SIL 
declined. This result indicates that the UME may have affected ENP whales due 
to reduced energetic gain on some Arctic/sub-Arctic foraging grounds, while 
PCFG whales are recovering from poor prey conditions during the NE Pacific 
marine heatwave event of 2014–2016. Surprisingly, we found that PCFG whales in 
Oregon had significantly worse body condition than whales in SIL, even when 
accounting for year and phenology. We derive support for this unexpected 
finding via photogrammetry analysis of opportunistic aerial images of gray 
whales on Arctic foraging grounds (n=18) compared to PCFG whales in Oregon 
(n=30): the body condition of PCFG whales was significantly lower (t=2.96, 
p=0.005), which may cause PCFG whales to have reduced reproductive capacity or 
resilience to environmental perturbations compared to ENP whales. Overall, our 
study elucidates divergent gray whale body condition across sub-groups and 
time, and we demonstrate the value of UAS to effectively monitor and identify 
the physiological response of whales to climate change.


The article is open-access and available at:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.867258/full

Cheers,
KC


KC (Kevin) Bierlich, PhD, MEM
Postdoctoral Scholar
Geospatial Ecology of Marine Megafauna 
(GEMM<https://mmi.oregonstate.edu/gemm-lab>) Lab
Marine Mammal Institute | Dept. of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Conservation Sciences
Oregon State University
Pronouns: he, him, his
kcbierlich.com<https://www.kcbierlich.com>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>













_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to