Dear colleagues,

On behalf of our coauthors, we are happy to share two new publications 
resulting from the 3S Behavioural Response Study. Using different but 
complementary analyses of the same set of experiments, these studies show that 
behavioural responses of sperm whales to operational naval sonar are affected 
by both sonar received level and source-receiver distance.

Paper 1:
Curé, C, Isojunno, S, Wensveen, PJ, Siemensma, ML, von Benda-Beckmann, AM, 
Kvadsheim, PH, Burslem, A, Benti, B, Roland, R, Lam, FPA & Miller, PJO (2025). 
Severity scoring of sperm whale behavioral responses to an operational sonar 
source reveals importance of received level and source-receiver distance. 
Aquatic Mammals 51, 8-27

Naval sonar's impact on marine life is a long-standing concern. Our study 
conducted off Norway aimed to investigate the effect of both the received level 
(RL) and the source-receiver distance on whales' responses to sonar. We 
cooperated with a naval frigate and used an experimental sonar (SOCRATES) to 
conduct controlled sonar exposure experiments at different source levels and at 
various distances from sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) tagged with 
acoustic-and-movement-recorder devices (Mixed-DTAGs). Behavioral responses were 
scored using a severity scale from 0 to 9. We showed that the probability and 
severity of scored responses increased significantly with higher RL (scored as 
SELmax, the maximum sound exposure level received during an exposure session) 
and lower distance (scored as DISTmin, the minimum source-receiver distance 
during an exposure session). Various behavioral responses occurred over a broad 
range of severities (1 to 7), including changes in vocal and dive behaviors, 
avoidance responses, cessation of feeding or resting activities, orientation 
responses, and changes in locomotion. Close proximity (< 1.5 km) of the source 
vessel without sonar transmission influenced whale behavior, although it was to 
a significantly lesser extent than with sonar. Dose-response relationships, 
including onset response RL and source-receiver distance, revealed that whale 
responsiveness declined more sharply with source-receiver distance than 
expected based solely on RL. The model predicted 14 km as a statistically 
significant distance threshold beyond which no responses would be expected 
independent of RL. At 225 dB re 1 µPa m source level, the model predicted that 
the estimated effective impacted area dropped from 1,770 km2 when only RL was 
considered to 27 km2 (factor 65) when both RL and source-receiver distance were 
considered. These findings underline the importance of taking into account both 
RL and source-receiver distance in assessing the impact of naval sonar on whale 
behavior.

Open access link:
https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.51.5.2025.8

Paper 2:
Wensveen, PJ, Isojunno, S, Kvadsheim, PH, Lam, FPA, Curé, C von Benda-Beckmann, 
AM & Miller, PJO (2025). Distance matters to sperm whales: Behavioural 
disturbance in response to both sonar received level and source distance. 
Marine Pollution Bulletin 214, 117742.

Understanding the main drivers of behavioural disturbance in deep-diving 
cetaceans would improve predictions of anthropogenic noise effects on 
individual animals, habitats and populations. To investigate the potential 
roles of received level and source distance on behavioural disturbance, we 
tagged 14 sperm whales in northern Norway with multi-sensor data loggers and 
conducted dose-escalation experiments. Each experiment included 1 to 4 tagged 
individuals and involved multiple vessel passes ('exposure sessions', n = 25 
total) by a navy frigate or research vessel towing a naval sonar, at different 
starting distances and maximum source levels. We analysed behaviour state 
series and proxies for locomotor activity and foraging success with generalized 
additive mixed models. The probability of occurrence of non-foraging active 
behaviour was affected by received level, source distance and session order, 
with decreased foraging effort at higher received levels and shorter distances, 
and during subsequent sessions (indicating short-term sensitisation). Prey 
capture attempts decreased with increasing received level when whales kept 
foraging. Similar to what has been suggested for some populations of blue 
whales and beaked whales regularly exposed to navy sonar, but unlike northern 
bottlenose whales in more pristine waters, source distance affected sperm whale 
behavioural responses on a high-latitude foraging ground.

Open access link:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117742


All the best,
Paul


_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
MARMAM@lists.uvic.ca
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to