Hello MARMAM community,

I am pleased to share our paper recently published Open Access in the
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (JASA):

Gemma Veneruso, Lucille Chapuis, Gordon D. Hastie, Lewis Le Vay and Line S
Cordes (2025) "Tidal flow masks acoustic detections of harbour
porpoises (*Phocoena
phocoena*): Implications for passive acoustic studies of cetaceans.

https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0039560

ABSTRACT:
Passive acoustics is widely used to detect vocalising cetaceans, yet in
tidal environments, strong currents facilitate sediment transport, creating
“flow noise” that may mask signals and bias detection ranges. Although
detection ranges
are known to vary with background noise, the magnitude and spatiotemporal
scale of such variation in tidal environments remain poorly quantified.
Flow noise may fluctuate within tidal cycles and across small spatial
scales,
with consequences for estimating cetacean occurrence. To examine this, we
tested the effects of flow noise on harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena)
echolocation click detection, from data collected from an array of
moored recorders in a tidal stream environment. Flow noise overlapping with
porpoise clicks varied by up to 29 dB in mean
sound pressure levels within tidal cycles ( 12 h). Differences between
sites<500 m apart were also significant, and modelled relationships between
porpoise occurrence and tidal flow speed changed when a fixed detection
threshold was applied. These findings show that flow noise in tidal
habitats is heterogeneous across space and time, which may
bias estimates of cetacean occurrence and distribution. Accounting for flow
noise is therefore essential in ecological studies and is particularly
relevant in environmental assessments of tidal energy developments.

With best wishes,

Gemma Veneruso
_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to