Dear MARMAM community,

On behalf of my coauthors, I am pleased to share our recently published paper:

Landine, A., Iniguez Bessega, M., and Andriolo, A. (2026). Acoustics and 
anthropogenic underwater noise in the IWC Scientific Committee (1951–2024): a 
systematic document review and scientometric synthesis. Frontiers in 
Conservation Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2026.1894111

The paper is available open access at:
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/conservation-science/articles/10.3389/fcosc.2026.1894111/full

In this study, we provide a long-term synthesis of how acoustics and 
anthropogenic underwater noise emerged, expanded, and diversified within the 
International Whaling Commission (IWC) Scientific Committee between 1951 and 
2024. Using a PRISMA-guided systematic document review combined with 
scientometric and qualitative analyses, we screened 7,830 Scientific Committee 
documents and identified 644 relevant records.

Our findings trace the development of underwater noise from a specialized 
acoustic topic into a policy-relevant environmental issue, highlighting 
temporal trends, major sound sources, reported impacts, institutional 
participation, and the interaction between scientific knowledge and governance 
within the IWC.

Abstract:

Anthropogenic underwater noise has become a major environmental and 
ocean-governance concern affecting marine mammals worldwide, motivating 
increasing attention within international conservation bodies such as the 
International Whaling Commission (IWC). Here, we reconstruct how acoustics and 
anthropogenic underwater noise emerged, expanded, and diversified within the 
IWC Scientific Committee through a PRISMA-guided document screening combined 
with scientometric and qualitative classification analyses.

A total of 7,830 Scientific Committee documents produced between 1951 and 2024 
were compiled and screened using an automated keyword strategy, yielding 2,949 
records for eligibility assessment. Following screening, 644 documents were 
retained for analysis, encompassing both acoustic-related studies and documents 
addressing anthropogenic underwater noise as an environmental or management 
issue.

Among these, 594 documents (7.4%) addressed acoustics, spanning 50 years 
(1962–2024) with a marked increase from the late 1990s onwards. Explicit 
underwater-noise content was identified in 180 documents (2.16%), first 
appearing in 1979 and recurring across 38 years, with contributions 
concentrated in the Environmental Concerns, Small Cetaceans, and Whale Watching 
sub-committees.

Ten standardized sound-source categories were identified, dominated by 
shipping, seismic surveys, and sonar, while additional sources emerged 
progressively over time. Reported impacts were primarily behavioral and 
spatial, whereas auditory damage and mortality were associated with 
high-intensity sources. Institutional participation was extensive, involving 
559 institutions across 75 countries, but remained highly concentrated among a 
limited number of recurrent contributors.

Together, these findings provide the first long-term synthesis of how 
underwater noise evolved within the Scientific Committee from a specialized 
acoustic topic into a policy-relevant environmental issue, revealing how 
scientific knowledge, institutional priorities, and governance discussions 
co-evolved within the IWC framework.

Best regards,

Anne Landine
Juiz de Fora Federal University
Instituto Aqualie
Brazil
_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to