I think my attempt to introduce the concept of a "well-defined undef"
into the technical literature may not have been a high point in its
history. I think it's best for me to back off from that way of
"explaining" entirely.
-- jeffrey
On 12/19/2013 01:49 AM, Ron Savage wrote:
Does it make sense then, to extend that 'clearer' statement:
A glade's token alternative is a symch all by itself. In this case,
the ID is undef.
Or is that just wrong?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "marpa parser" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa
parser" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
