i.e. unsigned long long int, isn't it. There is already such a check, and I pulled a die instead of the fallback c.f. pull request #/67 <https://github.com/jeffreykegler/Marpa--R2/pull/67>
Le dimanche 5 janvier 2014 19:03:21 UTC+1, Jeffrey Kegler a écrit : > > Actually, to be specific, what I really want to require is "unsigned > long long" -- jeffrey > > On 01/05/2014 09:29 AM, Jeffrey Kegler wrote: > > The list was pretty quiet, but I assume the consensus is that I can > require a compiler that supports "long long" in Marpa::R2. Could you > rewrite the Config::AutoConf logic to "fast fail" if the architecture does > not provide a "long long"? I've already done this for the GNU autoconf. > > Thanks, jeffrey > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
