On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Ron Savage <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sometimes I catch myself assuming that LTM failures backtrack and try a > shorter match, the same way I assume it for regexps. > > And sometimes I don't catch myself assuming that :-((. > Well, regexps have nobacktrack mode, so tokenizer can have optional backtrack mode. Played a little with "longest expected token match" a little in Repa and it helped me get rid of a grammar workaround I had, so it proves itself to be useful. Combining this with per token flag may be even more powerful. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "marpa parser" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Best regards, Ruslan. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
