Hi Jeffrey, Very interesting read, thanks for sharing the full details!
I wonder how you maintain your "developer sanity" in practice - do you have a Marpa benchmark over a variety of test grammars and input strings, which helps you to evaluate if and by what degree the Marpa performance (i.e. runtime, rather than just coverage) has improved/deteriorated? Apart from that, the way you have described the LR(0) manipulation, it seems quite clearly an unpleasant mechanism to both develop and maintain in the long run. So best of luck making Marpa better, both for us to use and for you to maintain! Deyan On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Jeffrey Kegler < [email protected]> wrote: > I'm doing this all on the master branch. "safe" is a branch which does > not include any of this, though I'd probably revert to the last developer's > release if it came to that. -- jeffrey > > > On 01/15/2014 11:04 AM, Durand Jean-Damien wrote: > > Many thanksfor these explanations, in which I recognize pedagogic efforts > for non language-theorist! > Looking forward the dev. releases. > Which is the git branch ? > Thanks / JD. >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "marpa parser" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "marpa parser" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
