let's go with interface Le dimanche 16 février 2014 03:35:22 UTC+1, Jeffrey Kegler a écrit : > > Re "interface 2", I can go with something that has a bit more "hype", > like > > dsl maker 2 > > -- jeffrey > > On 02/15/2014 05:58 PM, Durand Jean-Damien wrote: > > :default ::= action => ::array sound the best to me, because it is > natural when we read a grammar to expect as many values as there are RHS. > > I quite liked to proposal of ron, although IMHO lhs better fits in > blessing, despite the fact that beginners will always certainly do > Data::Dumper(), whose output is simply unmanagable with hundreds of > blessed structures - in contrary to a lhs that would be added to [values]. > But I'd not make that a default. > > What puzzles me is the presence of "interface 2", or is it "revision 2". > Meaning is clear. Backward compatibility constraint is clear. But this look > strange. Unfortunately, until a major version change, there is no real > alternative. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
