> > Questions: > Are these for C or Perl or both?
> 1.) What should be its name? [Probably not doit() ]. > I'd like it to be called process(). > 2.) I think doit() should throw an exception on error -- that's most > convenient in simply apps. Does that sound right? > Yes, if it ties in with Try::Tiny being the recommended handler at the Perl level. That means $_ will hold the msg. > 3,) Also, doit() could catch ambiguous parses, and throw an error on > those, with an error message indicating where the ambiguity happened. > Currently ambiguity must be explicitly checked for. If you don't, and > it's a problem, you (in effect) have a silent error condition. Should I > treat ambiguous parses as errors? > Could that be an option? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
