I'm happy to see people becoming very aggressive about using Marpa, but a good rule of thumb is that if something is a regular expression in the narrowest sense, and is not super-large, you should use a regex engine.
"Regular expression in the narrowest sense" means something built up entirely from concatenations, '*', '+', '|'. For these, even a mediorce regex engine just murders Marpa. -- jeffrey On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Christopher Layne <[email protected]> wrote: > I probably wouldn't use a grammar/parser for something that is literally > just dot-separated atoms. > > -cl > > On Oct 3, 2014, at 1430 PT, Ron Savage <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Here's a potential project: > > > > https://publicsuffix.org/ > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "marpa parser" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected]. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "marpa parser" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
