Jean-Damien and I are now chatting on IRC about a Marpa::R2 extension that might make it easier for him to allow comments, etc., in the AST, without rewriting his grammar.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Zeev Atlas <[email protected]> wrote: > Could they be discarded into some bucket with position and length > associated and than I can access that bucket and deal with it ? :) > ZA > > > On Thursday, January 8, 2015 12:52:10 AM UTC-5, Durand Jean-Damien wrote: > >> Zeev, >> >> Comments is an orthogonal rule, that have no place in the BNF except in >> the discarded thing, and per def discarded things are not part of the final >> AST. >> In conclusion, this is not supported. >> >> Regards, Jean-Damien. >> >> Le jeudi 8 janvier 2015 04:11:32 UTC+1, Zeev Atlas a écrit : >>> >>> I had a chance to feed some SQL statements of varied complexity to >>> MarpaX::Languages::SQL2003::AST. I do not yet look into error >>> capturing, so all the SQL statements that I use are absolutely valid. My >>> current task is to review and understand the produced XML. >>> I've noticed that while the parser recognizes comments as such and >>> correctly ignores them, it does not produce them in the XML output. Would >>> it be that hard to produce a valid XML comment: >>> <!-- My comment within SQL statement --> >>> Or is that already a supported option? >>> Thanks >>> ZA >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "marpa parser" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
