I've just removed the only copyright assignment language that was in
any of my repos -- the language I had put into the kollos repo.  So
that, I believe, closes this issue.

I'll return to other licensing stuff, with a new RFD, in a while,
after I've caught up with other matters.

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:57 AM, David Yingling <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree. No copyright assignment is best, because it is a very polarizing 
> topic
> in the open source community. I seem to be the only one on this list who's 
> very
> vocal against it, but larger issues like the annoying required paperwork to
> actually achieve copyright assignment, or that virtually no open source
> project's even use copyright assignment are also at work. Quite a few open
> source projects use CLAs, but only the FSF seems to use full blown copyright
> assignment successfully, and they have extra staff to handle the added
> paperwork.
>
> I'm glad you decided to tread carefully here, because a confusing legal
> situation with a open source project's license might also keep interested 
> users
> and contributors away.
>
> Switching to MIT should be possible due to both projects having few big
> contributors, and rewritting a few smaller contributors' odd documentation
> fixes here or there shouldn't be too big a job. The biggest hurdle might be
> small patches from others that you yourself as the project leader have added 
> to
> git under your own name. I don't know if any such patches exist, but that's a
> possible headache with switching licenses. It might also be possible to choose
> to ignore the small patches, and just be sure all the big pieces are in order,
> but proper accounting of all patches getting relicensed to MIT would provide
> better piece of mind especially for those who absolutely must avoid GPL code.
>
>
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:28:53 -0800
> Jeffrey Kegler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Given things have proved more complex than I anticipated, I want to
>> separate out the issue of assignment of copyright, to change what I
>> propose, and to start the discussion over.  (Though of course we'll all
>> have the old one in mind.)
>>
>> I propose to have *no* assignment of copyright for any of my repos. From
>> the previous discussion, this seems to be the trend in the open source
>> community, and the position most likely to attract contributors and users.
>>
>> With Marpa::R2 and Libmarpa, this means keeping the status quo.  No change.
>>
>> In the Kollos distribution, I had started it with an assignment of
>> copyright line in the README.   I propose to remove this, so that all of my
>> repos are consistent: none of them will require, request, or accept,
>> assignments of copyright.
>>
>> (I now see that I should have announced the assignment of copyright clause
>> that I was adding to the Kollos repo.  In mitigation of this mistake, I'd
>> point out that it's had no significant contributions but mine, and that at
>> the time I thought that move was unproblematic.)
>>
>> You'll notice that I'm being very careful in these IP matters.  I think
>> they deserve it, not least because they set a tone within the Marpa
>> community.  And, of course, the largest downside of not having copyright
>> assignment, is that it becomes very hard to undo any mistakes.
>>
>> I hope from this fresh start, the question of copyright assignment will
>> come to a quick consensus.  Once this issue is settled, I will re-raise the
>> issue of re-licensing under the MIT/Lua license.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "marpa parser" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "marpa parser" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"marpa parser" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to