Readers of this group may recall that conversion of Libmarpa to an MIT/Lua license was discussed, but got side-tracked because I combined the proposal with an unpopular proposal to change to copyright assignment. Ruslan S. has generously agreed to take this on, so that I can concentrate on coding.
I believe that conversion to the MIT license had a consensus, but it is an important matter, and I wanted to be sure. By the way, I am grateful to David Yingling for taking on the task of expressing the growing dislike of copyright assignment, and thereby stopping me from taking what might well have been a counter-productive step. On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Ruslan Shvedov <[email protected]> wrote: > Further to the talk on IRC [1] with Jeffrey Kegler, the author of > Libmarpa, on his request, I'm restarting the discussion [2] about switching > Libmarpa to the MIT/Lua license [3] so that to ask opinions on the matter > and make sure that we have consensus on that licensing change. > > As detailed in [2], this licensing change will not apply to the code > derived from LGPL'd code written by others, such as obstacks and AVL. > > [1] http://irclog.perlgeek.de/marpa/2015-02-12#i_10104254 > [2] http://groups.google.com/d/msg/marpa-parser/5IVTcnCqGwo/EfPbnbOOp6oJ > [3] http://www.lua.org/license.html > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "marpa parser" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
