The difference seems to be between what are called "permissive" licenses and copyleft licenses. Perl license is a dual-license, and the licensee gets the choice. The artistic license 1.0 seems to be accepted as permissive. This "Perl license" is by far the most used license on CPAN, and nobody seems to squawk about it.
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Ed Avis <[email protected]> wrote: > Jeffrey Kegler <jeffreykegler@...> writes: > > >Under the LGPL, there were cases where the company lawyers told people > they > >could not read my code. > > Have you checked that GPL+Artistic would fix this? I would imagine that > the > same lawyers would give the same answer. > > -- > Ed Avis <[email protected]> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "marpa parser" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
