i was recently asked about a possible extension of the Aycock-Horspool method. In reply I noted that Marpa no longer uses Aycock-Horspool items, and gave the reasons:
I used the AH items, but eventually decided to go back and rip them out. I discovered they bought little or nothing in terms of measurable speed-up, and at a very real cost. AH's own implementation apparently had bugs due to duplication of Earley items. I solved these, but it made the code very complex and slower. Eventually I ran some numbers and realized that most of the compression that the AH method bought was in predictions, which could be compressed in other, less complicated, ways. Using AH items means that whenever something needs to be done in terms of the user's grammar, there has to be a translation. Since the AH item to Earley item relationship is many-to-many, this is not trivial. I was eventually able to implement Marpa features that required checking items at real-time, translating back and forth on the fly into traditional Earley items, but I realized that the complexity of dealing with AH items would be a very serious obstacle to future work. By the time I backed out the AH items, I'd invested considerable more time into working them than anyone, including (I believe) Aycock and Horspool themselves. Even if you don't want the flexiblity of working with Earley items in realtime, any compression of Earley items must be undone at evaluation time. In addition to AH, a few papers have described ways to reduce the number of Earley items, but these focus on taking things as far as the recognizer -- they produce the Earley tables and stop. Often the question of the cost of undoing the compression at evaluation time is not addressed, and the cost of the more complex evaluation phase seems likely to eliminate any speed-up in the recognizer. I want to point out that in that same paper, Aycock and Horspool, as a side issue, describe a way of handling nulled symbols and productions via grammar rewrites. This proved very valuable and Marpa *does* continue to use that. It's a bit ironic that I ended up ignoring what AH's paper was intended to be about, but that what (I think) they present as little more than an implementation trick has proved central to my efforts. But because of their solution to the question of nullable symbols and rules, I consider Marpa to be a parser in the Aycock-Horspool lineage, despite its renunciation of AH items. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to marpa-parser+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
