Jerry gives a great reply to Buford..
>
>Your (re) definition simply asserts that any authoritarian government or
>regime, if led by socialists, would be social-fascist. Jim H is right --
>look at the knots Chris B has tied himself in. *By his definition*, China
>under Mao could qualify as being social-fascist!
No, Chris would never draw his line the whole way unless NATO were to attack China
over Mongolia..Then he would be wailing his democratic imperialist guitar strings.. As
he does both on Ireland and Jugoslavia.
Warm Regards
Bob Malecki
--- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
