I find this article no more objectionable than when a subscriber to a
"marxism" list said that:
a) he wanted to see two women Marxists, then engaged in a debate, fight
each other in mud-wrestling (to which he said he would pay the price of
admission);
b) his love life was a mess and saying rather explicitly what was wrong
with the women in his past relationships (and indicating who they were *by
name on a public mailing list), and asking the marxism list for women
volunteers;
c) when angered by what another subscriber said in criticism of what he
wrote, he (in utter futile and sexist desperation) complained that it
was "that time of the month" for that subscriber.
Jerry
--- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---