Progressive Magazine, Feb 18, 2002 - Web Exclusive

The Pentagon Mindset: Poison Them! Deep inside the
sixth of eight glowing articles in its series "10 Days
in September" about what wonderful crisis managers
George W. Bush and Condoleezza Rice are, The Washington
Post on February 1 buried the following bit of
information: The Pentagon was considering poisoning
Afghanistan's food supply.

http://www.progressive.org/webex/wx021 802.html

===
Vietnam blood dioxin levels "startling" - US expert

< http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory
.cfm/newsid/14842/story.htm>

Story by David Brunnstrom REUTERS NEWS SERVICE VIETNAM:
March 4, 2002

HANOI - A leading expert on the Vietnam War defoliant
Agent Orange said last week new tests on people living
in a heavily sprayed part of Vietnam had found
"startlingly high" levels of cancer-causing dioxin.
However, speaking ahead of a key conference on the
effects of Agent Orange beginning in Hanoi on Sunday,

Arnold Schecter said tests on Vietnamese food exports
to the United States had shown generally lower dioxin
levels than in U.S. products, despite claims to the
contrary from opponents of Vietnamese imports.
Schecter, a professor at the School of Public Health at
the University of Texas, told Reuters blood tests from
43 people living around the former U.S. airbase of Bien
Hoa, near Ho Chi Minh City, had found dioxin levels up
to 206 times higher than average. He said one person
tested, who was born in 1973, two years after U.S.
forces stopped spraying Agent Orange in Vietnam, had
413 parts per trillion of TCDD, the dioxin
characteristic of Agent Orange. This compared with two
parts per trillion on average in Vietnam. The Bien Hoa
tests showed an average of 67 parts per trillion -
still 33 times higher than average, Schecter said.
"This means 30-40 years after Agent Orange was sprayed,
people are still being contaminated," he said. "This
shows Agent Orange is not just a historic event, but
something that is still with us in hotspots like Bien
Hoa." "It means dioxin can persist a very long time in
the environment and in certain cases contaminate people
and in others substantially contaminate people."

MILLIONS OF GALLONS SPRAYED The United States sprayed
millions of gallons of Agent Orange and other
defoliants on Vietnam from 1962 to 1971 to deny
communist fighters jungle cover. The chemicals included
TCDD, the most dangerous form of dioxin, a known
carcinogen. It is also blamed for causing immune
deficiency, birth defects, reproductive problems,
diabetes and nervous system disorders.

Schecter said the most likely form of contamination of
those at Bien Hoa was river fish. He said some
opponents of Vietnamese seafood exports to the United
States had used the Agent Orange issue to try to scare
off American consumers from the products. However,
tests for the University of Texas on 20 samples of
Vietnamese fish bought in Texas and California found
dioxin levels that were generally lower than U.S. food
products. For example, he said, one Vietnamese catfish
sample showed just 0.01 parts per trillion. "These are
very low levels." Schecter said the tests suggested
Hanoi's fear that allowing food samples to be taken for
testing abroad could damage key exports was misplaced,
given that only five percent of the country was ever
sprayed with Agent Orange. "That means that most food
is not contaminated with dioxin," he said, while adding
that there were an unknown number of Agent Orange
"hotspots" like Bien Hoa in Vietnam.

After Agent Orange was found to cause cancer in
laboratory rats, the U.S. military suspended its use in
1970 and halted all herbicide spraying in Vietnam the
following year. Vietnam's government blames defoliants
for causing tens of thousands of birth defects and says
the United States should pay compensation. The United
States has long argued there is no scientific evidence
linking Agent Orange to the birth defects. Sunday's
conference, co- organised by the United States and
Vietnam, will review current research on the impact of
dioxin on human health and on the environment and
discuss research plans.

Reply via email to