Jim Farmelant 
As long as you're going to continue presenting us your
greatest hits from the past, how about a discussion
of Maurice Cornforth's relationship with analytical
philosophy. I recall reading the other day, that he
had been a student of Wittgenstein. Is there any
more information available about that? I know
that from the 1960s on, he made some attempt
to engage the then linguistic philosophy in his
writings, while George Reisch in his book,
*How the Cold War Transformed the Philosophy
of Science* says that he had taken a somewhat
sympathetic stance towards the logical positivists
in the 1930s when the Communists were will
to look to them as intellectual allies. And
there is, of course, Cornforth's 1968 book,
*The open philosophy and the open society: 
A reply to Dr. Karl Popper's refutations of Marxism*.
Any comments about Cornforth on Popper?

^^^^^
CB: I read the book about twelve years ago. I reviewed it more recently when
the subject of Popper  ( and maybe Cornforth ) came up here ( and maybe on
Marxmail). 

Cornforth is critical but , I'd say somewhat respectful of Popper. He
indicates, of course, that Popper's anti-Hegelianism and
anti-evolutionism/historicism is a lacking.  Considering things in their
motion is actually to treat them more concretely, because reality is in
motion , not static.

(For Popper to attack Hegel on historicism or the motion of everything is to
pretty much lose the arguments right there. There is but one science, the
science of history, Prof. Popper. That is the aspect of Hegelianism that is
its rational kernel. Popper becomes of interest because he is so influential
in a certain time period . This is me, not Cornforth that I recall, though
he may say the same thing more politely.)

I have to go back and see some of his direct response to Popper's claim that
Marxism is not falsifiable. I sort of got more into reading the book for
Cornforth's ideas than for Popper's. It was a sort of _Anti-Duhring_ type
read for me, though I wouldn't say that Cornforth was as hard on Popper as
Engels was on Duhring.

I recall that Cornforth emphasizes Engels approach to dialectics as the
interconnectedness of everything in the discussion.

I actually dug up my copy for the most recent discussions here, so I'll
review it. I always write notes in books I read, so I can review it based on
my notes.

Oh here it is. The first chapter is "The Scientific Character of Marxism"



_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to