Weekend Edition (CounterPunch)
October 14-15, 2006

Soulless New World
Bush's Military Commissions Act and the Future of America

By JENNIFER VAN BERGEN

"The legacy of Nuremberg and the solemn undertaking that Justice Jackson 
gave for the United States at the opening session, are under assault by the 
Bush Administration, which has embraced a radical world view that rests on a

cult of power and a disdain for law."
Scott Horton, When Lawyers Are War Criminals
Before Congress recessed, it passed, amid much criticism, the Military 
Commissions Act (MCA). The Act has consequences for citizens and 
non-citizens alike. Among it's worst features, it authorizes the President 
to detain, without charges, anyone whom he deems an unlawful enemy 
combatant. This includes U.S. citizens. It eliminates habeas corpus review 
for aliens. It also makes providing "material support" to terrorists 
punishable by military commission. And, once again, the military commissions

procedures allow for coerced testimony, the use of "sanitized classified 
information" (where the source is not disclosed), and trial for offenses not

historically subject to trial by military commissions. (Terrorism is not 
historically a military offense; it's a crime.) Finally, by amending the War

Crimes Act, it allows the president to authorize interrogation techniques 
that may nonetheless violate the Geneva Conventions and provides future and 
retroactive immunity for those who engage in or authorize those acts.

Given the troubling new broad powers Congress has given the President, what 
will happen now?

While the President has consistently insisted these laws are necessary, it 
is becoming increasingly clear that, in addition to a huge up-swelling of 
anti-American sentiment in the Middle East, the administration's approach to

terrorism has led to a tremendous number of false arrests and imprisonments.

It is hard to imagine that the MCA will not lead to more and greater 
mistakes of law and judgment. Although the Act provides for trial by 
military commission, it is unlikely very many will even be tried. As Michael

Ratner points out: "As detainees can now be held forever without trial, why 
try them?"

Here's the picture: Citizens and non-citizens alike will be rounded up and 
detained without charges. Alien detainees in America will fall into the same

legal black hole the Bush administration created at Guantanamo, the same 
hole the secret CIA "Black Site" detainees fell into. From all the evidence 
we have, a large percentage of these "disappeareds" will be innocent. They 
will be innocent but they will be subjected to interrogation methods 
developed by the CIA and preserved by the MCA which only a sociopath could 
view as anything other than torture and which violate long-standing laws of 
war.

Citizen detainees will sit in detention for months or years. New detention 
centers will spring up across the country (and reportedly already are being 
built) to house the influx of what will essentially be an entire new colony 
of inmates, a massive new world of souls declared unworthy of basic human 
rights or judicial notice.

In fact, the Act envisions and institutionalizes a whole new worldview. In 
this new world, there is no longer a distinction between a criminal and an 
enemy combatant. Think what this means. Traditionally, an enemy combatant is

a soldier of those against whom we have declared war. Or, as Guantanamo 
defense attorney P. Sabin Willett says, "When you declare a war you make of 
your opponent a soldier, which is to say, a person of honor."
Under the MCA worldview, all soldiers who do not fight for America are now 
criminals.

(The administration's distinction between lawful and unlawful enemy 
combatant is a red herring. The administration has completely refused to 
acknowledge the existence of any lawful enemy combatant in their "war on 
terror." All are unlawful combatants, which means they are terrorists, which

means they are criminals. The "war on terror," then, is actually a massive 
criminal manhunt and prosecution, except without the legal safeguards.)

The blur also works in reverse: terrorist criminals can now be tried by 
military commissions. Thus, we now have a world in which criminal laws are 
just obsolete inconveniences that prevent the state from protecting national

security during an endless undeclared war on an emotional state (terror).

It's a world of ever-increasing state fear conjoined with ever greater need 
to control all means and ends, all free-breathing thoughts, anything outside

of the ever-shrinking box which the state has allocated as our Free Speech 
Zone. It's a world in which torture is a matter of semantics, not humanity 
or morals. It's a world in which sociopaths -- those who are unable to feel 
for others or see how their decisions affect others -- make all the 
decisions.

What do good elementary schools matter in this world? What does education 
matter at all? Or medicine? A living wage? Social services? Public 
transportation? A roof over our heads? Voting rights? Does society's 
infrastructure matter at all? War is all that matters. The enemy is 
everywhere. All our resources and energies must be directed against him.

Those who protest against this new regime become as much the enemy as 
terrorists. ("Those who are not with us are against us.") Those who stand up

for common decency and basic human rights are the enemy.

The MCA worldview precludes listening to the populace; it is intent, rather,

on controlling it. Greater and greater numbers of the populace feel unheard 
and powerless, encouraging more fear, which in turn opens the door for more 
government intervention: "You have good reason to fear. The danger is real, 
but WE will protect you." The hidden agenda is: "Give us more power."

The promise of protection is empty, though, because, vampire-like, it 
thrives on fear, and it sucks the spirit out of Americans.

With the populace silenced and paralyzed, lawyers will have to take up the 
cause of preserving our freedoms. At minimum, then, the near future will 
bring legal challenges. The MCA will be challenged in court. Over 500 cases 
already on federal dockets will be affected by the MCA.

And when will all this end? The MCA does not sunset. Although Congress never

formally declared war on al Qaeda or the Taliban or Saddam or Afghanistan or

Iraq or anyone anywhere else, the Authorization to Use Military Force passed

by joint congressional resolution in November 2001 provides the President 
with open-ended and (what he, at least, deems as) endless authority to carry

on this nebulous "war," which he does avidly without either standing firmly 
on the laws of war or resorting finally to the criminal laws. He picks and 
chooses what he finds useful and convenient for his task of creating this 
new worldview, the consequences of which neither he nor his Cabinet fully 
comprehend for the future of America.

P. Sabin Willett asks: "We need to acknowledge, if we are thoughtful people,

that terror is everywhere, and has been with us always, and involves all 
kind of people who later get called men of peace.'"

"Does any single thoughtful person . . . think she will live to see the end 
of terrorism? And thus the end of the global war against it? Do you think 
you'll watch on TV as the Emperor of Terror comes aboard a Navy warship to 
sign the instrument of surrender? A phenomenon that has run down from the 
1st Century to the 21st, you think George Bush is the measure of? Your 
grandchildren will never see that ticker-tape parade."

Willett concludes: "So can we at least be honest with ourselves? When we say

the President has special powers during the global war on terror, we are 
saying he has them forever. Always and forever can the President lock people

up at Guantanamo without meaningful judicial review. Always and forever he 
can ignore the Congress's ban of torture, as he vowed to do last December 
30."

Always and forever. It's a long time to spend in the soulless new world 
created, with Bush's persuasion, by the Military Commissions Act. 





_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to