_http://www.greenleft.org.au/2007/717/37245_ 
(http://www.greenleft.org.au/2007/717/37245) 
 
Permaculture and Marxism
 

Barry Healy
14 July 2007
 

It is often thought that concern for the interconnection of living  systems 
is a modern development. But Karl Marx’s talked about it repeatedly  throughout 
his Capital. 

Marx didn’t use the word “ecology” — it was coined in 1866 — but  
metabolism . He argued that capitalist accumulation shatters basic processes of 
 
ecological sustainability “by destroying the circumstances surrounding 
[natural]  
metabolism”. Marx called this “metabolic rift”. So, he said, what is needed is  
the “systematic restoration [of natural metabolism] as a regulating law of  
social reproduction”. 
 
In other words: farming and other productive activities have to restore the  
ecological balance, and this can only really be achieved under a system where  
people and the environment come before profits — socialism. 
 
Australian-developed permaculture farming principles aim at restoring this  
balance. Within capitalist Australia, permaculture remains a fringe movement.  
But in socialist Cuba, it has become mainstream. Viewers of the inspiring film 
 The Power of Community can see with their own eyes the depth of meaning that 
 Marx attached to “healing the metabolic rift”. It is a physical healing of 
the  land, combined with a spiritual rejuvenation of human society. 
 
As Roz Paterson and Jack Ferguson reported in the May 25 Scottish Socialist  
Voice: “In the 1990s, Cuba made the transition from an industrial society, 
where  farming was conducted on a massive scale, with a heavy reliance on 
fossil  
fuel-based pesticides and fertilisers, to a sustainable one, with a food 
economy  based on small organic farms, workers’ co-operatives and urban 
gardens.” 
 
In Havana, more than 90% of perishable produce is grown within or near the  
city limits. “Nowadays”, Paterson and Ferguson explained, “while the children 
of  much richer nations begin to fall prey to diet-related diseases we thought 
we’d  seen the back of, such as malnutrition and rickets, as well as 
life-shrinking  levels of obesity, and at a time when we’re throwing away a 
third of 
all the  food we buy, Cubans are chowing down on the kind of food we can only 
aspire to —  local, organic, fresh — and learning to waste nothing”. 
 
The SSV reported that instead of artificial fertilisers, Cuban farmers use  
micro-organisms that enrich the soil, earthworms, compost, animal and green  
manure, and the integration of grazing livestock. 
 
Unfortunately, Australian agribusiness treats the soil like dirt. Similar  to 
using the earth as a hydroponic growth medium, synthetic fertilisers and  
pesticides are flung around and water pumped through. Farmers who resist these  
trends are subjected to financial pressure; meanwhile the soil turns acidic and 
 the rivers choke with algae. 
 
Another concern for Marx was the struggle over the Corn Laws, which between  
1815 and 1846 were tariffs protecting rich British farmers against foreign  
competition. Manchester-based industrialists successfully overturned the laws 
to 
 reduce the amount that they had to pay in wages. 
 
The factory bosses knew that keeping food cheap helps keep wages low. The  “
reproduction” of labour means workers have to arrive at work with enough food  
in their bellies to create surplus value for the boss. Cheapening food means  
that bosses can drive wages down towards a minimum sustenance level. 
 
But cheap food isn’t always good food: often it isn’t really food at all.  
In Marx’s day, cheap workers’ bread contained stone dust, chalk, pearl ashes,  
soap and other such choice items. In Capital, Marx quoted testimony to the 
1855  parliamentary inquiry into food adulteration that, because of 
contamination,  “the poor men who lived on two pounds of bread a day did not 
take in one 
fourth  of that amount of nutrition”. 
 
The modern equivalent of such contamination is food colourings and other  
additives. Eric Schlosser’s Fast Food Nation gives the 50 or so ingredients 
that  
constitute the typical artificial strawberry flavour. 
 
The artificial flavour industry took off in the 1950s, when the gas  
chromatograph and mass spectrometers were invented, allowing the detection of  
gases 
in minute quantities. This allowed for tiny amounts of odour and colour to  be 
attached to questionable foods. 
 
We can often tell whether food is fresh or stale by its colour, odour or  
taste. But artificial additives disguise this. What was ground up rock to our  
great grandparents is today the mystifying list of numbers on labels. The 
modern 
 equivalent to the factory owners’ victory over the Corn Laws is our cheap,  
mass-produced “food” — the modern McDiet. 
 
As a marginal product in Australia, organic food is a little more  expensive. 
But its price shows the real cost of producing authentic food. The  
artificial number soup slopped out by the Australian food industry simply isn’t 
 worth 
eating.
 
From: Comment & Analysis, Green Left Weekly issue #717 18 July 2007. 



************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to