CeJ jannuzi  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I believe the most fruitful lines of thought are centered on Lenin.
Tthat was, in part, his genius of adding the concept of imperialism to
Marxist thought; clearly WW I and its aftermath were real crises. It's
his conception of imperialism and his analysis of finance capitalism
that make him one of the first post-modern Marxists (especially if you
can accept the thesis, advanced by Althusser and others, that Marx is
foundational to structuralism in social scientific thought).

This leads to all sorts of flows and eddies in Marxist thinking but
perhaps the most important thinkers in this would be Deleuze and
Guattari, who as co-authors  become something like a single entity,
like Marx-Engels.

Unfortunately, they are both dead now. It would have been wonderful to
see them discuss the current crisis.

http://www.generation-online.org/p/fpdeleuze7.htm 

CJ


^^^^^^
CB: On Marxism as structuralism, below is my first substantive post to
an email list , almost exactly ten years ago, Marxism-Thaxis 1998.  It
is a structural marxist thought. 

^^^^^^


http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/marxism-thaxis/1998-March/007351.html
M-TH: A vulgar marxist here
Charles Brown charlesb at CNCL.ci.detroit.mi.us 
Tue Mar 17 14:27:56 MST 1998 

Previous message: M-TH: This is a test. I'm trouble getting the right
address 
Next message: M-TH: Re: M-I: Re: Marxism and the Indians of Peru, part
2 of 3 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

   By vulgar marxism I mean a constructive critic of fancy marxism and
its left-liberal cousins.  My general attitude is to extract the
rational 
kernel from the modern and post-modern left neo and paleo liberals from
Hegel to post-Foucaultists. So, I like the kernel of truth metaphor used
in the list discussion in the last day.
   As to the true universal Doug asked Yoshie for, I would build it.
not 
on a new idea, but Marx and Feuerbach's species-being. All of the
workers and other people represented by other social movements are human
species-beings. Although biiology only limits us human beings because we
have culture (super-natures and natures ) this contradiction between
biology and culture is still where it is at in generating universals or
big generalizations.
    Being determines consciousness is still a focal rule of thumb
(guide 
to action) for building a universal, real common interests among huge 
numbers of people, the masses.
     My first post-Marx development of species-being is to derive
women's liberation organically from historical materialism's premises,
as Marx and Engels derive workers' liberation from those species-being
historical premises.  It is a correction of classical Marxism, but based
on Marxism's own premises. In ways its too vulgar for pomos and fancy
marxists.
    However, the pomos and their old cousins, Frankfurt school,
Gramsci, existentialists, et al. all the fancy marxists have taught us
something: 
being determines consciousness discontinuously, intermittently, rarely.
 
Through most of the actual time of history, consciousness and being are
reciprocally determining. Only rarely, in revolutions, primarily and 
ultimately does being utterly determine consciousness.
  Today, that means that the direct naked appeal to the working class'

class self-interest is inadequate in itself-necessary but not
sufficient 
in the formal logical sense -to inspire revolution.  That appeal cannot
be dropped - the vast majority are working class, wage laborers - but
must be complemented with appeals to other consciousness, other
consciousness determined by being (gender, for example) and
consciousness that is determined more by consciousness.
  Overall one wants to change the world based on interpreting it,
changing it through practical-critical activity, a unity of theory and
practice still.
     All Power to the People as a whole.
           
         Charles Brown, your new comrade




_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to