If marxism contains a significant philosophical dimension then it should have attempted to establish the nature of knowledge and how certain that knowledge. Questions such as how we have knowledge of the world have not been adequately answered by marxism. Not even a serious attempt to answer these questions. This is just what Bertrand Russell sought the answers to.
Paddy Hackett -- ----- Original Message ----- From: "CeJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 2:47 PM Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Parting of the Ways WL writes:>>All the various Marxists writers, with few exceptions - like you, are partly to blame by defining Marxism as a philosophy. Nowhere can one find an ounce of philosophy in Marx most famous statements like the passages from the "Preface to A Contribution to A Critique . . ." where he speaks of the mode of _______________________________________________ Marxism-Thaxis mailing list Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
