The piece that CB had posted was referring to the first century
Christians, several centuries before the First Council of Nicea--by
the fourth century we could say that the sectarian lines dividing
Christians from Jews and Samaritans (and 'pagans') were already well
in place. In the first century, you couldn't.

One line of interpreting Jesus Christ and his ministry sees it as
emerging from a very interesting branch of the Pharisees--the Essenes,
even though the early Christians are seen as being 'anti-Essenes', and
that might well have been how they differentiated themselves from the
communities that originally they belonged to. This sort of Judaism, by
the way, would be quickly misunderstood if we imposed modern and
post-modern ideas of Judaism onto it,. There is another modern/post-mo
anachronism that leads people to think post-temple Judaism stopped
developing even before the early Christian period and that
Christianity sprung full-blown as the modern religion we know it as
today from this Judaism (or as some religious Jews would have it,
Christianity sprung from something other than Judaism, in order to
deny this huge schism in early Talmudic Rabbinical Judaism). Judaism
and Christianity underwent enormous changes in competition with each
and then later, for example, with the rise of Islam.  Mostly the
'center of action' for all this interaction was not 'Palestine' but
'Babylonia'.

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?letter=E&artid=478

A branch of the Pharisees who conformed to the most rigid rules of
Levitical purity while aspiring to the highest degree of holiness.
They lived solely by the work of their hands and in a state of
communism, devoted their time to study and devotion and to the
practise of benevolence, and refrained as far as feasible from
conjugal intercourse and sensual pleasures, in order to be initiated
into the highest mysteries of heaven and cause the expected Messianic
time to come ('Ab. Zarah ix. 15; Luke ii. 25, 38; xxiii. 51). The
strangest reports were spread about this mysterious class of Jews.
Pliny (l.c.), speaking of the Essene community in the neighborhood of
the Dead Sea, calls it the marvel of the world, and characterizes it
as a race continuing its existence for thousands of centuries without
either wives and children, or money for support, and with only the
palm-trees for companions in its retreat from the storms of the world.
Philo, who calls the Essenes "the holy ones," after the Greek ὅσιοι,
says in one place (as quoted by Eusebius, "Præparatio Evangelica,"
viii. 11) that ten thousand of them had been initiated by Moses into
the mysteries of the sect, which, consisting of men of advanced years
having neither wives nor children, practised the virtues of love and
holiness and inhabited many cities and villages of Judea, living in
communism as tillers of the soil or as mechanics according to common
rules of simplicity and abstinence. In another passage ("Quod Omnis
Probus Liber," 12 et seq.) he speaks of only four thousand Essenes,
who lived as farmers and artisans apart from the cities and in a
perfect state of communism, and who condemned slavery, avoided
sacrifice, abstained from swearing, strove for holiness, and were
particularly scrupulous regarding the Sabbath, which day was devoted
to the reading and allegorical interpretation of the Law. Josephus
("Ant." xv. 10, § 4; xviii. 1, § 5; "B. J." ii. 8, §§ 2-13) describes
them partly as a philosophical school like the Pythagoreans, and
mystifies the reader by representing them as a kind of monastic order
with semi-pagan rites. Accordingly, the strangest theories have been
advanced by non-Jewish writers, men like Zeller, Hilgenfeld, and
Schürer, who found in Essenism a mixture of Jewish and pagan ideas and
customs, taking it for granted that a class of Jews of this kind could
have existed for centuries without leaving a trace in rabbinical
literature, and, besides, ignoring the fact that Josephus describes
the Pharisees and Sadducees also as philosophical schools after Greek
models.

Their Communism.(comp. B. M. ii. 11).

"No one possesses a house absolutely his own, one which does not at
the same time belong to all; for in addition to living together in
companies ["ḥaburot"] their houses are open also to their adherents
coming from other quarters [comp. Aboti. 5]. They have one storehouse
for all, and the same diet; their garments belong to all in common,
and their meals are taken in common. . . . Whatever they receive for
their wages after having worked the whole day they do not keep as
their own, but bring into the common treasury for the use of all; nor
do they neglect the sick who are unable to contribute their share, as
they have in their treasury ample means to offer relief to those in
need. [One of the two Ḥasidean and rabbinical terms for renouncing all
claim to one's property in order to deliver it over to common use is
"hefker" (declaring a thing ownerless; comp. Sanh. 49a); Joab, as the
type of an Essene, made his house like the wilderness—that is,
ownerless and free from the very possibility of tempting men to theft
and sexual sin—and he supported the poor of the city with the most
delicate food. Similarly, King Saul declared his whole property free
for use in warfare (Yalḳ.,Sam. i. 138). The other term is "heḳdesh
nekasim" (consecrating one's goods; comp. 'Ar. vi. ; Pes. 57: "The
owners of the mulberry-trees consecrated them to God"; Ta'an. 24a:
"Eliezer of Beeroth consecrated to charity the money intended for his
daughter's dowry, saying to his daughter, 'Thou shalt have no more
claim upon it than any of the poor in Israel.'" Jose ben Joezer,
because he had an unworthy son, consecrated his goods to God (B. B.
133b). Formerly men used to take all they had and give it to the poor
(Luke xviii. 22); in Usha the rabbis decreed that no one should give
away more than the fifth part of his property ('Ar. 28a; Tosef., 'Ar.
iv. 23; Ket. 50a).] They pay respect and honor to, and bestow care
upon, their elders, acting toward them as children act toward their
parents, and supporting them unstintingly by their handiwork and in
other ways"

Not even the most cruel tyrants, continues Philo, possibly with
reference to King Herod, have ever been able, to bring any charge
against these holy Essenes, but all have been compelled to regard them
as truly free men. In Philo's larger work on the Jews, of which only
fragments have been preserved in Eusebius' "Præparatio Evangelica"
(viii.), the following description of the Essenes is given (ch. xi.):

Essene View of Resurrection.

"Particularly firm is their doctrine of Resurrection; they believe
that the flesh will rise again and then be immortal like the soul,
which, they say, when separated from the body, enters a place of
fragrant air and radiant light, there to enjoy rest—a place called by
the Greeks who heard [of this doctrine] the 'Isles of the Blest.'
But," continues the writer, in a passage characteristically omitted by
Josephus, "there are other doctrines besides, which many Greeks have
appropriated and given out as their own opinions. For their
disciplinary life [ἄσκησις] in connection with the things divine is of
greater antiquity than that of any other nation, so that it can be
shown that all those who made assertions concerning God and Creation
derived their principles from no other source than the Jewish
legislation. [This refers to the Ḥasidean "ma'aseh'merkabah" and
"ma'aseh bereshit."] Among those who borrowed from the Essenes were
especially Pythagoras and the Stoics; their disciples while returning
from Egypt did likewise [this casts new light on Josephus'
identification of the Essenes with the Pythagoreans: "Ant." xv. 10, §
4]; for they affirm that there will be a Judgment Day and a burning up
of the world, and that the wicked will be eternally punished.(comp.
Horwitz, "Baraita di Nidda," i. 2).

"Also prophecy and the foretelling of future events are practised by
them. [Josephus has in addition: "For this purpose they are trained in
the use of holy writings, in various rites of purification, and in
prophetic (apocalyptic?) utterances; and they seldom make mistakes in
their predictions."] Then there is a section of the Essenes who, while
agreeing in their mode of life, differ in regard to marriage,
declaring that those who abstain from marrying commit an awful crime,
as it leads to the extinction of the human race. But they take wives
only after having, during three years' observation of their course of
life, been convinced of their power of child-bearing, and avoid
intercourse during pregnancy, as they marry merely for the sake of
offspring. The women when undergoing ablutions are arrayed in linen
garments like the men in order not to expose their bodies to the light
of day"


Relation of Essenism to Christianity.

John the Baptist seems to have belonged to the Essenes, but in
appealing to sinners to be regenerated by baptism, he inaugurated a
new movement, which led to the rise of Christianity. The silence of
the New Testament about the Essenes is perhaps the best proof that
they furnished the new sect with its main elements both as regards
personnel and views. The similarity in many respects between
Christianity and Essenism is striking: There were the same communism
(Acts iv. 34-35); the same belief in baptism or bathing, and in the
power of prophecy; the same aversion to marriage, enhanced by firmer
belief in the Messianic advent; the same system of organization, and
the same rules for the traveling brethrendelegated to charity-work
(see Apostle and Apostleship); and, above all, the same love-feasts or
brotherly meals (comp. Agape; Didascalia). Also, between the ethical
and the apocalyptic teachings of the Gospels and the Epistles and the
teachings of the Essenes of the time, as given in Philo, in
Hippolytus, and in the Ethiopic and Slavonic Books of Enoch, as well
as in the rabbinic literature, the resemblance is such that the
influence of the latter upon the former can scarcely be denied.
Nevertheless, the attitude of Jesus and his disciples is altogether
anti-Essene, a denunciation and disavowal of Essene rigor and
asceticism; but, singularly enough, while the Roman war appealed to
men of action such as the Zealots, men of a more peaceful and
visionary nature, who had previously become Essenes, were more and
more attracted by Christianity, and thereby gave the Church its
otherworldly character; while Judaism took a more practical and
worldly view of things, and allowed Essenism to live only in tradition
and secret lore (see Clementina; Ebionites; Gnosticism).


------------------------

There were also the Ebionites in the 2nd to 4th century. Apparently
early Christians of the Levant referred to themselves as 'Ebionim',
which might have inspired the name of this sect. Islam to quite an
extent mirrors--perhaps assimilates--their Christology.

EBIONITES   (print this article)

        By : Kaufmann Kohler


Sect of Judæo-Christians of the second to the fourth century. They
believed in the Messianic character of Jesus, but denied his divinity
and supernatural origin; observed all the Jewish rites, such as
circumcision and the seventh-day Sabbath; and used a gospel according
to Matthew written in Hebrew or Aramaic, while rejecting the writings
of Paul as those of an apostate (Irenæus, "Adversus Hæreses," i. 262;
Origen, "Contra Celsum," ii. 1; Eusebius, "Hist. Eccl." iii. 27;
Hippolytus, "Refutatio Hæresium," vii. 34; Jerome, Commentary on
Isaiah, i. 3, 12; on Matt. xii. 13). Some Ebionites, however, accepted
the doctrine of the supernatural birth of Jesus, and worked out a
Christology of their own (Origen, l.c. v. 61).

The origin of the Ebionites was, perhaps intentionally, involved at an
early date in legend. Origen ("De Principiis," iv. 1, 22; "Contra
Celsum," ii. 1) still knew that the meaning of the name "Ebionim" was
"poor," but refers it to the poverty of their understanding (comp.
Eusebius, l.c.), because they refused to accept the Christology of the
ruling Church. Later a mythical person by the name of Ebion was
invented as the founder of the sect, who, like Cerinth, his supposed
teacher, lived among the Nazarenes in Kokabe, a village in the
district of Basan on the eastern side of the Jordan, and, having
spread his heresy among the Christians who fled to this part of
Palestine after the destruction of the Temple, migrated to Asia and to
Rome (Epiphanius, "Hæreses," xxx. 1, 2; Hippolytus, l.c. vii. 35, x.
22; Tertullian, "De Præscriptione Hæreticorum," 33). The early
Christians called themselves preferably "Ebionim" (the poor; comp.
Epiphanius, l.c. xxx. 17; Minucius Felix Octavius, ch. 36), because
they regarded self-imposed poverty as a meritorious method of
preparation for the Messianic kingdom, according to Luke vi. 20, 24:
"Blessed are ye poor: for yours is the kingdom of God"; and "Woe unto
you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation" (=Messianic
share; Matt. v. 3, "the poor in spirit," is a late modification of the
original; comp. Luke iv. 18, vii. 22; Matt. xix. 21 et seq., xxvi. 9
et seq.; Luke xix. 8; John xii. 5; Rom. xv. 26; II Cor. vi. 10, viii.
9; Gal. ii. 10; James ii. 5 et seq.). Accordingly they dispossessed
themselves of all their goods and lived in communistic societies (Acts
iv. 34 et seq.). In this practise the Essenes also were encouraged,
partly by Messianic passages, such as Isa. xi. 4, xlix. 3 (comp. Ex.
R. xxxi.), partly by Deut. xv. 11: "The poor shall never cease out of
the land"—a passage taken to be a warning not to embark upon commerce
when the study of the Law is thereby neglected (Ta'an. 21a; comp. also
Mek., Beshallaḥ, ii., ed. Weiss, 56; see notes).


----------------------
One more key term is 'Nazarenes', which many find difficult to
distinguish from the Ebionites.

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=140&letter=N

Sect of primitive Christianity; it appears to have embraced all those
Christians who had been born Jews and who neither would nor could give
up their Jewish mode of life. They were probably the descendants of
the Judæo-Christians who had fled to Pella before Titus destroyed
Jerusalem; afterward most of them, like the Essenes in former times,
with whom they had some characteristics in common, lived in the waste
lands around the Dead Sea, and hence remained out of touch with the
rest of Christendom.

For a long time they were regarded as irreproachable Christians,
Epiphanius ("Hæres." xxix.), who did not know much about them, being
the first to class them among heretics. Why they are so classed is not
clear, for they are reproached on the whole with nothing more than
with Judaizing. As there were many Judaizing Christians at that time,
the Nazarenes can not be clearly distinguished from the other sects.
The well-known Bible translator Symmachus, for example, is described
variously as a Judaizing Christian and as an Ebionite; while his
followers, the Symmachians, are called also "Nazarenes" (Ambrosian,
"Proem in Ep. ad Gal.," quoted in Hilgenfeld, "Ketzergesch." p. 441).
It is especially difficult to distinguish the Nazarenes from the
Ebionites. Jerome obtained the Gospel according to the Hebrews (which,
at one time regarded as canonical, was later classed among the
Apocrypha) directly from the Nazarenes, yet he ascribed it not only to
them but also to the Ebionites ("Comm. in Matt." xii. 13). This gospel
was written in Aramaic, not in Hebrew, but it was read exclusively by
those born as Jews. Jerome quotes also fragments from the Nazarenic
exposition of the Prophets (e.g., of Isa. viii. 23 [in the LXX. ix.
1]). These are the only literary remains of the Nazarenes; the
remnants of the Gospel according to the Hebrews have recently been
collated by Preuschen in "Antilegomena" (pp. 3-8, Giessen, 1901).

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to