V. 

I want to try to be clear to avoid misunderstanding about  what legal 
segregation actually meant. 

For 50 years - between 1920  and 1970, Detroit had an extra legal curfew 
imposed on the black where they had  to be off the streets at sun down or risk 
being jailed and shot. It was extra  legal because no laws existed on the 
books but the “curfew law existed in fact”  and was enforced by the police 
and understood by every level of local  government. Exceptions were made for 
workers on the night shift and weekends  when traveling to entertainment 
events. 

Literally, if you stood on  the corner talking, the police would drive up, 
roll down the window and say,  “give me that corner.” This was a warning to 
disperse or be “beat  down.”   An elaborate system of communications 
developed where you  were informed the police were 2 blocks away and closing in 
fast, allowing one to  take to the alley ways. 

Black power is what it was, as the demand  for entry into the political 
system. In this sense the struggle of the blacks  was no different than the 
struggle of the Irish, Italian or any other “national  group“ that becomes 
large enough in a jurisdiction to take control of the  “machine.” The color 
factor complicated the struggle of the blacks, meaning all  the various 
groupings dominating the “city machine” had to be fought because  their unity 
was 
based on the isolation and exclusion of the blacks. Black Power  meant 
black political power or the politics of combating, inheriting and taking  over 
the “city machine” in the North and the local political jurisdictions in  
the South enforcing fascist segregation. Thus, the path of the fight could 
only  take place on the basis of the post legal Jim Crow segregated voting 
market,  because white voters as a general rule could not and would not elect a 
black.  

The refusal of whites to elect blacks during this period cannot be  
causally spoken of as “just” racism without qualification. Beneath the color  
factor is “the city  machine factor,“ or the system of spoils and payoffs  in 
every American city. Jobs in the police force and all levels of governments  
and city services are at stake. Awarding contracts for city services 
involves  more than the actual workers hired and require the system of lawyers, 
 
accountants and land speculators every time a new road is built or a new 
housing  development is proposed. This system evolved before blacks entered the 
 
industrial class and is based on nationality or the immigrant status of 
waves of  European immigrants. The Irish had to built up their mass in a 
jurisdiction as  did the Italian and Polish to grab hold of the city machine. 
Pretty much the  same with the blacks + the color factor. 

The demand for black  police officers was an exceptionally brutal and 
violent struggle in Detroit and  Cleveland. This was a period of desegregation 
that birthed the “Black Guardians”  within police departments in the major 
cities. The Black Guardian were black  police officers literally forced to 
fight the semi-fascist polices of their  local police departments. More often 
than not, the Black Guardians played an  exemplar role in protecting the 
social movement from fascist attacks by segments  of the police department. 
This 
was certainly the case in Detroit. The point is  that at a certain stage in 
the change process the structures of control become  paralyzed and at odds 
with itself. An example of this I experienced was the case  of protesting at 
Cooly High school in Detroit and not the one in Chicago named  after the 
movie. In the process of the demonstration a police care literally ran  into a 
mass of people injuring many. The police pull out their guns to shoot us.  
The Black Guardian on the scene pulled out their gun and aimed them at the 
heads  of the other officers and told them if they fired one shot they would 
shoot  them. This happened because our struggle was just. Then there was the 
tip off to  many of us that the police were in the process of preparing to 
raid the Black  Panther office and kill them. This tip off allowed people to 
go to the Panthers  office along with the press to halt the attack. 

We are poised to  experience a new form of the social movement and need to 
be mindful of how  things happen. At the end of the day the majority of the 
people of our country  are going to line up with the proletarian revolution 
because it is just.  

Control of the police force also involves management of crime and  drugs 
and who gets paid. The city machine and police get paid through various  
sources, including crime. In Detroit the struggle within the union and on the  
factory floor was electoral and extra legal, frequently erupting in gun play.  
This struggle is often misunderstood. The struggle of the lowest paid 
unskilled  is always sharp and violent as these workers press to control the 
internal union  organization in opposition to the skilled trades. The color 
form 
of this  struggle, extremely intense in Detroit, meant challenging the 
company and union  and armed conflict within the building trade hiring halls. 
This aspect of the  social conflict is a proletarian insurgency rather than 
racial conflict. The  form of the conflict appear as the color factor because 
the blacks were the last  hired and first fired. 

Within the police department a nasty  struggle involving the police 
invading home and gathering of another group of  police and shooting them. The 
press reported this as a mistaken raid on a  suspected “drug den” when what 
actually happened was a regular night of “poker  Friday.” 

Finally, the 1967 Rebellion over rode the ability of the  local police 
power to control the street. Watts 1965 and then Detroit 1967  rendered the 
police organization and city machine irrelevant and obsolete. The  development 
of what is today SWAT units trace its legacy to Watts 1965 and  Detroit 1967. 
The battle for the streets was won. Nothing short of continuous  military 
occupation can win the streets back to the bourgeois power.  

VI. 

With respect to the UAW - autoworkers union,  their “progressive” label as 
being left wing is unwarranted. It is not that  Walter Reuther and his crew 
pushed the union from its progressive rail. Rather,  Reuther 
institutionalized the latent semi-fascist features inherent to a trade  union 
movement 
evolving in a pure capitalist country, decades after the  industrial 
bourgeoisie has established its hegemony.  After the industrial  bourgeoisie 
establishes hegemony this means the battle to reform the system in  is favor 
has been 
won, and society is reorganized along a rail that must run its  course. 
Unions are a mixed bag of things, some good and some bad. Union are more  good 
than bad at the front of the curve of the social process.  

Unions are by definition exclusionary, compelled to service their  members 
at the exclusion of non-members. This unavoidable feature of union is  the 
result of the wage form of labor or capital. Capitalism is founded on  
converting everyone into a slave that has to sell their labor ability for wages 
 
to the owners of production. In turn you must compete in the market to sell 
your  labor ability.  When Marx writes that wage labor rest exclusively on 
the  competition of wage earners for wages that is what he meant. An old 
America  capitalist said the same thing by saying “I have enough money to pay 
one 
section  of the working class to kill the other.” Unions function to dampen 
the  competition of the laboring within their jurisdiction or the same 
trade. Without  the selfless fight and activity by three generations of 
communists and  militants, our union movement would have been horribly 
reactionary. 
In the  struggle for the industrial form of unions the black workers were 
decisive in  places like Ford Rouge.  

In a wider arena the color factor  was also the central issue that 
prevented the breakout of the union movement in  the 1930’s and 40’s. There was 
no 
way to advance and secure the unions without  organizing the South. 
Organizing the South meant confronting the color factor  head on and overcoming 
the 
historic split in the working class movement. The  unions could not or would 
not take this step. One may choose either explanation  because each 
explanation provides and becomes the environment for the other.  

I can state without any hesitation that the color question was not  tackled 
in any fundamental way, until the blacks achieved a critical mass that  
allowed them to tackle the question themselves. There is a lesson in this. The  
destitute proletariat will tackle questions for itself when it learns it 
has no  other recourse.  

In a country such as ours, there has never  existed the “political space” 
for the evolution of an independent trade union  movement or workers 
political parties. Nor did the political space exist for  workers candidates as 
was 
the cause in developing bourgeois Europe.  In  Europe, the transition from 
feudalism to capitalism was bounded by the  interactions of four primary 
classes - nobility and serf, capitalist and  workers, and the need of the 
capitalist to rely upon the defeat of the feudal  oligarchy, which in turn 
created the political space for the emergence of  workers parties or social 
democracy.  This was not the case in America.  

Although it did not happen all at one time, the evolutionary path  of the 
trade union founded on the old industrial order, cast them as an  appendage 
of the State department = semi-fascist. The alternative to tackling  the 
color question and the colonial entrapment of the core plantation area of  the 
South, a colony, was a condition under which the trade unions became  
something akin to a labor front and an appendage of the State Department.  

We do not want to confuse the color factor as it affected blacks  
throughout the totality of the multi-national state and the Southern Colonial  
Question - the Negro Nation, which is a geographic area corresponding to the 
old  
plantation system. 

Before 1965, revolutionaries and people of good  will fought every step of 
the way against color discrimination, but the lack of  understanding of the 
political rather than biological nature of the race  question made the color 
factor an insurmountable barrier. This happened because  the American 
people became convinced that they were dealing with a biological  rather than a 
political question. This point desires emphasis because the great  economic 
and political changes taking place today are having a profound effect  on the 
politics of race and color. The idea and ideology that blacks exist at a  
lower evolutionary stage than whites and unity of whites is needed to ensure 
the  stability and cohesion of society is increasingly untenable. 

An  honest narrative of the American working class movement cannot avoid 
stating  that the CIO (Congress of Industrial Organization of the 30’s and 1940
’s)  evolved as the unskilled organization of the white workers, bitterly 
opposing on  complex levels, the entry of blacks into the ranks of the union 
and the labor  force. Only when the Northern unions catastrophic defeat hung 
in the balance  have blacks been able to wring out of the unions a molecule 
of justice. No where  was this clearer than in the long history to unionize 
Ford. In this fight it was  a narrow layer of communist, groups of black 
communists and people of good will  that provided the critical balance in 
unionizing Ford. 

Black Power  was the necessary and inevitable out come of Civil Rights and 
the revolutionary  collapse of Jim Crow and with critical hindsight served 
as the exact same kind  of “form“ as the old nationality organizations of a 
previous generations of  unskilled workers, minus the “European” language 
press.   Today, in  the period of Obama, this new narrative can reach the 
light of  day.

With the destruction of legal segregation the infrastructure  framework for 
the unity of classes constituting the black community was  shattered as 
various classes and strata amongst the dark - the black and brown,  took their 
place alongside of their counterparts. Specifically, this took shape  as the 
dispersal of different classes of blacks outside the central cities of  
America. 

The Voting Rights Act in turn was meant for the South  rather than the 
North, and had the irony of allowing more whites entry to  voting, who were 
excluded from the electoral process, due to the poll tax and  ridiculous 
obstacles to registration. The control of the black and their  isolation has 
always 
been directed at controlling the whites. 

This  shattering of the black community had its political repercussions 
within the  political superstructure as the black politician found themselves 
in  need  of leaping to a broader political basis than the segregated voting 
market. This  in turn demanded reforming the national political 
infrastructure historically  blocking the black from “going national.” 

The election of Obama  completes a gigantic historical loop that has 
brought a sector of the  proletariat fact to face with the bourgeoisie, and not 
in 
just a partial manner.  Obama was elected by the voting section of the 
working class. The American  proletariat, viewed as a class, does not vote in 
its majority.  


WL. 




_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to