Marxism-Thaxis] Alan Carling's synopsis of *The Proofofthe Pudding:
Reason and Value in Social Evolution*
Charles Brown CharlesB at cncl.ci.detroit.mi.us
Tue Feb 19 12:29:02 MST 2002

Marxism-Thaxis] Alan Carling's synopsis of *The Proofofthe Pudding:
Reason and Value in Social Evolution*
Charles Brown CharlesB at cncl.ci.detroit.mi.us
Tue Feb 19 12:29:02 MST 2002

Previous message: [Marxism-Thaxis] Alan Carling's synopsis of *The
Proof ofthe Pudding: Reason and Value in Social Evolution*
Next message: [Marxism-Thaxis] Alan Carling's synopsis of
*TheProofofthe Pudding: Reason and Value in Social Evolution*
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More on the anthropological school of thought that has delved into
Carling's hypothesis at length.  Note White's energy capture thesis
which is based on an interpretation of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.

Charles Brown



Neoevolutionism
Leslie White began working with evolutionary theories in the 1930's.
At the time, unilineal evolution was unpopular with anthropologists
because generalizations were made based on little evidence. Also,
unilineal evolution seemed to encourage racist ideas by equating
evolution with progress. However, it was being observed that cultures
did change, or evolve. White began studying evolution to attempt to
understand why evolution in cultures occurs. Neoevolutionism is
characterized by this attempt to find a mechanism for cultural change,
which is typically environmental adaptations.

White also believed that evolution is a unilineal process. However, he
eliminated the use of racial terms and ranking of cultures. He also
came up with a mechanism for evolution. He felt that cultures evolved
as a result of their ability to capture and use more energy. His
equation describing this is C=E × T. C stands for culture, E stands
for energy and T stands for technology. White thought of societies as
sociocultural systems and studied sociocultural change on a global
scale, so his theories are called general evolution.

Julian Steward felt that White was too broad in his theories. Steward
instead focused on how individual cultures evolved and how environment
affects culture. Because Steward emphasized the role environment
plays, he became the first proponent of cultural ecology, and his
ideas influenced later cultural materialists. He felt that similar
environmental challenges resulted in similar cultural outcomes. He
tested this theory by studying the evolution of the earliest
agricultural societies. Steward felt that while it is true that all
cultures evolve, they don't all necesarily evolve in the same way. He
called his approach multilinear evolution, as opposed to Tyler and
Morgan's unlineal evolution, and what he called White's universal
evolution.

Marshall Sahlins and Elman Service formed an evolutionary theory that
unified White's and Steward's approaches to evolution. They defined
two forms of evolution, specific evolution and general evolution.
Specific evolution refers to specific societies and relates to
Steward's approach. General evolution encapsulates White approach and
refers to a general prograss of human society, in which higher forms,
which capture more energy, arise from and surpass lower forms.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More on the anthropological school of thought that has delved into
Carling's hypothesis at length.  Note White's energy capture thesis
which is based on an interpretation of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.

Charles Brown



Neoevolutionism
Leslie White began working with evolutionary theories in the 1930's.
At the time, unilineal evolution was unpopular with anthropologists
because generalizations were made based on little evidence. Also,
unilineal evolution seemed to encourage racist ideas by equating
evolution with progress. However, it was being observed that cultures
did change, or evolve. White began studying evolution to attempt to
understand why evolution in cultures occurs. Neoevolutionism is
characterized by this attempt to find a mechanism for cultural change,
which is typically environmental adaptations.

White also believed that evolution is a unilineal process. However, he
eliminated the use of racial terms and ranking of cultures. He also
came up with a mechanism for evolution. He felt that cultures evolved
as a result of their ability to capture and use more energy. His
equation describing this is C=E × T. C stands for culture, E stands
for energy and T stands for technology. White thought of societies as
sociocultural systems and studied sociocultural change on a global
scale, so his theories are called general evolution.

Julian Steward felt that White was too broad in his theories. Steward
instead focused on how individual cultures evolved and how environment
affects culture. Because Steward emphasized the role environment
plays, he became the first proponent of cultural ecology, and his
ideas influenced later cultural materialists. He felt that similar
environmental challenges resulted in similar cultural outcomes. He
tested this theory by studying the evolution of the earliest
agricultural societies. Steward felt that while it is true that all
cultures evolve, they don't all necesarily evolve in the same way. He
called his approach multilinear evolution, as opposed to Tyler and
Morgan's unlineal evolution, and what he called White's universal
evolution.

Marshall Sahlins and Elman Service formed an evolutionary theory that
unified White's and Steward's approaches to evolution. They defined
two forms of evolution, specific evolution and general evolution.
Specific evolution refers to specific societies and relates to
Steward's approach. General evolution encapsulates White approach and
refers to a general prograss of human society, in which higher forms,
which capture more energy, arise from and surpass lower forms.

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to