Tea Party, Coffee Party: Why Not A Black Party?
By Ron Walters
NNPA Columnist


http://www.michigancitizen.com/default.asp?sourceid=&smenu=76&twindow=Default&mad=No&sdetail=8428&wpage=1&skeyword=&sidate=&ccat=&ccatm=&restate=&restatus=&reoption=&retype=&repmin=&repmax=&rebed=&rebath=&subname=&pform=&sc=1070&hn=michigancitizen&he=.com




Now we have the Coffee Party, which I suppose is a liberal counterpart
to the Tea Party that emerged in the Washington, D.C., area by folks
led by Annabel Park, a documentary filmmaker who was horrified by the
ugly, menacing, anti-government spirit of the Tea Party crowd that
emerged to disrupt the flow of civil discussion about important
issues.  I’ve been asking, ‘Where are the folks who voted for Barack
Obama, believing in Hope and Change and pinning for a new post-Bush,
post-Conservative America?’

Well, many of the ground troops of the Obama movement that were
responsible for its grass roots organizing were young adults who went
back to school, back to their professional desks or somewhere back to
their normal pursuits, but away from politics.  In their
de-mobilization, they left the field open to the crazies who have
mounted a movement not designed to be a force for change, but for the
status quo and even for retrogression, wanting to “take back America”
from a future they fear.

Organizing for Change, the organization created as the repository of
the Obama campaign, has largely been ineffective in my evaluation and
David Plouffe, its head and Obama’s campaign manager, has recently
gone into the White House.

So, what is developing is a discussion at the community level across
the country about the role of government and the Tea Party, and now
the Coffee Party. The Republican party seems to be attempting to grab
hold of the Tea Party movement and turn it into an election day force
against Democrats vulnerable to elections in this cycle.   At this
point, the Coffee party has not come that far and the Democratic party
has not made its move.

Where does this put Blacks?  There is a healthy discussion going on in
the Black community about the role of President Obama and his
responsibility, or the lack of it, to the Black community, but with
the exception of Tavis Smiley for all the folks who believe that they
have to make him accountable to a Black agenda, they have not yet put
a mechanism on the ground to do it.

There has been a long discussion about the efficacy of a Black
political party and many years ago, I joined Ron Daniels and others in
an attempt to create one.  The irony of that experiment was while half
of the people attracted to the idea wanted it to serve as a power-base
for elections, others wanted to only exist as a grass roots organizing
tool.  It eventually split apart along those lines.

Today, it is clear, however, that beyond the general discussion about
accountability, there needs to be not only a place where you get down
to the “nuts and bolts” about exactly who should be accountable about
what, but how to develop effective methodologies of tactics and
strategies to achieve it.  Thus, whether you call it a party or a
posse doesn’t matter, the point is that there is a necessity to
mobilize to achieve the ends people are talking about.

A Black party could enable the discussion about accountability to
focus on the cabinet agencies where the Federal budget exist to
achieve some of the things needed by the Black community.  Some of the
specific programs being rolled out around jobs and a new focus on home
foreclosure and etc. look good, but others, such as “race to the top”
as an educational program, looks questionable to me — and the issue is
that few of these programs across the board have been developed with
the vigorous input and engagement of those for whom the programs are
supposed to be designed.

A Black party could also monitor and engage local initiatives more
effectively.   Where the rubber meets the road is in the local
communities and there, mayors, county officials, state legislators and
others presumably have some idea of what it takes to make Black
communities whole, what resources are addressed to that task and what
is lacking.  A mobilized force could assist in this task of projecting
community needs and monitoring whether or to what extent they are met.

What I am suggesting has been happening to some extent with the
vigilance of our Civil Rights organizations, the Institute of the
Black World 21st Century and the action of progressive Black officials
at the national, state and local levels.

However, there should be a greater role for citizen engagement and a
Black party mechanism could be the key.  What we are witnessing is the
rush of media attention to these movements, a dynamic that gives them
power and places our interests farther and farther into the
background.  Mobilizing would give us the power to regain the footing
to address the truth of our condition.

Dr.  Ron Walters is a Political Analysts and Professor Emeritus of the
University of Maryland College Park.  His latest book is: The Price of
Racial Reconciliation (University of Michigan Press).
rwalt...@umd.edu.

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to