What is glaringly missing from this piece by Petras is any sense that he is in favour of COMMUNISM. In fact he does not use the word at all and seems to have the view that he prefers capitalism to communism. His analysis of what has defeated the left and centre-left parties and made them historically irrelevant is laughable - he is still married to "the left" rather than to proletarian power held by a class-for-itself. Related to this is the highly problematic feature of his writing that it is much easier to see what he is against than to see what he is FOR - what kind of a society he would like to live in. If communism is out for Petras, we are entitled to ask: "Well then, what manner of future could it possibly be that you Petras want to live in?"
Phil Walden On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Jim Farmelant <farmela...@juno.com> wrote: > > In recent years, I have found a lot of > Petras's commentary on various subjects > to be rather loopy, but not this piece. > > Jim Farmelant > http://independent.academia.edu/JimFarmelant > www.foxymath.com > Learn or Review Basic Math > ---------------------------------------------- > http://canadiandimension.com/articles/3480/ > > > Web Exclusive: The Democratic Party Debacle and the Demise of the > Left-Center Left > > A Worldwide Trend > James Petras | November 6th 2010 > > Introduction > > The November 2, 2010 electoral debacle of the Democratic Party in the US > cannot be solely ascribed to the failed policies of President Obama, the > Congressional leadership or their senior economic advisers. Nor is the > demise of what passes for the American "center-left" confined to the > US-it > is a world-wide pattern, expressed in countries as diverse as Greece, > Portugal, Spain, Great Britain and Japan. > > The central question is why the left-center left governing parties are > everywhere in crisis and will be for the foreseeable future? > > The Left-Center Left: Past Winners, Present Losers > > In the past leftist parties had been the beneficiaries of capitalist > crises: > Incumbent conservative regimes, which had presided over economic > recessions > or had been held responsible for military debacles, were ousted from > power > by leftist parties prepared to make large-scale, long-term public > investments, funded by progressive taxes on wealth and capital, and to > impose austerity programs on the rich and wealthy. > > In contrast, today the left/center-left (L-CL) regimes preside over > crisis-ridden capitalist economies and administer regressive > socio-economic > policies designed to promote the recovery of the biggest financial and > corporate enterprises while rolling back wages, social programs, pensions > > and unemployment benefits. > As a result, the L-CL has become the prime political loser in the current > > economic crisis, reaping hostility and rejection from the great mass of > its > former working class and salaried supporters. > > Wherever the Left has been elected in recent years, a deep polarization > developed between its electoral base and the governing party leadership. > Nowhere has the Left dared to infringe on the power and prerogatives of > the > very capitalist class of bankers and investors, who caused the crisis. > Instead with perverse and reactionary logic the Left-Center Left parties > have wielded stated power through the treasury to refinance capital, > through > the police and judiciary to repress labor and through the mass media to > justify its regressive policies (especially via anti-'chaos' hysteria). > > In Greece, the Pan-Hellenic Socialist regime (PASOK) has fired tens of > thousands of public employees and its tight fiscal policies have raised > unemployment from 8% to 14%. It has increased the age of retirement, > reduced > pensions and welfare provisions and raised fees for public services, > while > foreign and domestic bankers, ship owners and overseas investors have > benefited by accumulating property and distressed enterprises on the > cheap. > > Similar polices have been adopted in Spain and Portugal where public > employees' salaries and jobs have been slashed, pensions and welfare > payments have been reduced, job security has been deregulated and > employers > are free to hire and fire as never before. > > Prior to the British Labor Party's defeat, after more than a decade of > promoting wild unregulated financial and real-estate speculation leading > to > the economic crash, the Labor leadership was planning massive layoffs and > > cuts in social programs. > > In the United States, Obama and the Democrats were elected, on the basis > of > their promises to redress the grievances of the workers and salaried > employees, who had been battered by the collapse of Wall Street. Instead, > > the White House poured trillions of tax dollars to rescue the major > banking, > financial and speculative institutions responsible for the collapse while > > unemployment and underemployment has climbed to over 20% and 10 million > homeowners lost their homes through mortgage foreclosures. > > Why the L-CL Deepens the Crises > > Over the past 30 years the L-CL parties, which were once identified with > working class interests and welfare reforms, have become deeply embedded > in > managing the capitalist system-going so far as to promote the most > parasitic > and volatile forms of speculative capital. As long as capitalist profits > grew and speculative investments grew, the L-CL regimes believed that > sufficient tax revenue would accrue to allow for a degree of social > spending > to pacify their popular voting constituency. The L-CL parties > systematically > eliminated the last traces of a socialist, social welfare or > redistributive > alternative. > > The L-LC political leadership was unwilling to envision an alternative to > > their promotion of the policies of big corporate and banking interests as > > they led to financial crisis. When the big crash of 2007-2010 took place, > > the entire leadership of the L-CL was so deeply embedded in the > institutions, policies and practices of the leading private financial > structures, that the only solution they were capable of proposing was to > sacrifice the public treasury in order to restore capitalist leaders and > speculative institution to profitability. In other words, the U.S and > European L-CL parties were prepared to jettison over 50 years of social > advances. The past ties to their working-class voters, trade union > allies, > public employees and pensioners were severed, none were spared. The only > interest that mattered to the L-CL parties was to restore conditions for > profitability to benefit big overseas and domestic investors. > > This economic recession has forced the L-CL parties to give up any > pretext > that they could satisfy bankers and public employees, corporations and > workers, investors and pensioners. The crisis revealed the profound > distance > separating the working class from the political leaders of the L-CL. > > The savage class austerity measures, repeatedly imposed on the working > class > every 3-6 months, in contrast to the vast and repeated subsidies to > capital, > reveal the true vocation of the current L-CL regimes. There was never a > question of choice: From their entry into the government and from their > leading economic appointments, to their subsequent agreements with the > world's > leading banks, it has become obvious that the Papandreous (Greece), > Socrates > (Portugal), Zapatero (Spain) and Obama (USA) regimes were prepared to use > > the full power of the state to sacrifice labor to save capital. > Consequences > of L-CL Policies and Practices > > From the start, the L-CL parties decided there was everything to > negotiate > (and concede) with the bankers and nothing to negotiate and compromise > with > Labor. The recession was too profound, capitalist interests and > institutions > were "too big to fail", and labor was, in the eyes of the L-CL parties, > too > expendable: 'Let them march and yell in the streets'. Unemployment and > under-employment climbed to double digits everywhere. The old > arrangements > of accommodation between the trade unions and the L-CL parties came under > > intense pressure everywhere (except in the US and UK) from the workers in > > factory assemblies, the offices of the public employees, and among the > pensioners in the senior centers. > > Repeated general strikes broke out in France, Spain, Portugal, Greece and > > Italy. The L-CL regimes absolutely refused to make any concession to the > workers. The crises and austerity policies became the base for a real > class > war: The Left-Center Left regimes were determined to roll back over 50 > years > of working class advances. The general strikes were defensive battles to > protect hard won advances in decent living standards. Workers everywhere > in > Europe recognized the abominable working and welfare conditions in the > US, > where trade unions have become doormats and the millionaire trade union > bosses continue to use union funds to bankroll the Democrats and protect > the > bureaucracy's privileges and wealth. > > Conclusion > > The Left-Center Left regimes are paying a high electoral price for > sacrificing the working class in order to save the bankers: Obama's > recent > electoral defeat is only a forerunner of future losses for the Spanish, > Greek, Portuguese Socialists and other L-CL regimes. Their austerity > policies have led them to 'fall between two chairs': They alienate > workers > and strengthen the capitalist class, which already has its own "natural" > conservative capitalist parties. The "hard right" everywhere is > advancing, > sensing the debacle of the center-left as an opportunity to deepen and > widen > the frontal assault on labor rights, social welfare and any semblance of > legal protection. > > Faced with this assault, the main defense of militant workers in Southern > > Europe is the general strike, (totally absent for over a century in the > US). > But even so, given the ferocious backing of all of Europe's (and the US) > ruling classes for the regressive austerity policies, it is becoming > clear > that the positive experience of massive class solidarity is not enough. > Greece has had half dozen general strikes. France has been shut down by a > > nationwide strike. Spain has more to come. But their L-CL rulers continue > > slashing and burning workers rights and living standards now and for > years > to come. > > What will it take to stop and reverse this capitalist juggernaut? It is > clear, that the L-CL parties, as we know them, are part of the problem > and > not the solution. Will new working class parties and movements emerge > that > can combine mass general strikes with challenges for state power? Will > the > rising power of the electoral right lead to a parallel rise of the left? > As of today, little or nothing of a left-right political polarization > appears on the horizon in the United States where most of the union and > social movement leaders are tied to the Democratic Party. In contrast, in > > Europe, particularly in France, Greece, Portugal and Spain, > extra-parliamentary mass struggles will co > ____________________________________________________________ > How to Fall Asleep? > Cambridge Researchers have developed an all natural sleep aid just for you. > http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4cfb9ee71511a533452st03vuc > > _______________________________________________ > Marxism-Thaxis mailing list > Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu > To change your options or unsubscribe go to: > http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis > _______________________________________________ Marxism-Thaxis mailing list Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
