******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ******************** #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. *****************************************************************
Thanks for sharing, Louis. The critic mentions Liberia, but does not discuss it further. If the Lysistrata approach worked there, what's wrong with a filmmaker proposing it here? On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Louis Proyect via Marxism < marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu> wrote: > ******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ******************** > #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. > #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. > #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. > ***************************************************************** > > Chi-Raq contributes to a long-held tradition of citing Black women’s > bodies as both the source and the solution to social problems. In the film, > he has the movement completely rely upon the premise of hot young scantily > clad women refusing to have sex with their gangsta men. The inference is > that Black women have so much power and we can fix society if only we would > use our sexual power. In other words, all the responsibility is on us—and > our genitalia. > > > http://therealnews.com/t2/component/content/article/481-stacey-patton/2581-spike-lee-did-the-wrong-thing > _________________________________________________________ > Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm > Set your options at: > http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/sranz18%40gmail.com _________________________________________________________ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
