******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
(One hunger striker is serving a 15 year sentence for "insulting the
sharia". And the Assadist left has the gumption to defend Iranian
intervention in Syria as a way of defeating Islamic extremism? Madness,
NY Times, Jan. 10 2017
The Hunger Strike, the Protest Tactic of Gandhi, is Vexing Iran’s Penal
By THOMAS ERDBRINK
TEHRAN — The hunger strike, a pressure tactic of self-starvation used by
political protesters around the world, is forcing Iran’s powerful
judiciary to reconsider the conditions of at least one of its inmates
after several started fasts that are leading to widespread support on
The exact number of hunger strikers in Iranian prisons is unclear, but
according to human rights organizations and reports in local media
outlets, seven inmates, sentenced for crimes against the state, have
refused to eat for intervals ranging from several weeks to more than two
Their backgrounds vary, but they include an antigovernment protester, a
children’s rights activist, an ayatollah, a spiritual leader and a
Lebanese computer technology specialist convicted of espionage.
It is not possible to verify their conditions because of restrictions
preventing foreign reporters from visiting Iranian prisons without
permission. While some members of Iran’s Parliament have said on their
social media accounts that they are investigating the reports, other
officials have dismissed the hunger strikes as plots organized by
foreign opposition groups.
Conservative critics further argue that the extensive support for the
hunger strikers seen on social media networks is an exaggeration created
by automated messages.
One of the inmates, Arash Sadeghi, stopped his strike last Tuesday,
after the judiciary met his demand to temporarily release his imprisoned
wife. She was transferred back to prison on Saturday, said the couple’s
lawyer, Amir Raeesian.
Refusing to eat to protest conditions in prison is illegal in Iran, but
is not uncommon. However, the number of inmates now simultaneously
fasting, in combination with a large social media campaign, is unusual
in the country. It also providing a publicity platform for those in
prison, Iranian analysts say.
“The success is clearly motivating others to join,” said Nader Karimi
Joni, a journalist close to the reformist factions in Iran.
Two of the hunger strikers, Mr. Sadeghi and Ali Shariati, have been
convicted of crimes against the state — charges that by Western
standards would make them political prisoners. They went for nearly 70
days without food, advocates say, surviving on water and salts.
Mr. Sadeghi received a 15-year sentence last year for offenses like
“provoking protest gatherings,” “conniving with counterrevolutionaries
against the system,” “making propaganda against the system,” “insulting
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei” and “insulting the sharia,” his
lawyer, Mr. Raeesian, said. The “system” is an Iranian ideological term
for the country’s political establishment: a coterie of clerics,
commanders and revolutionary comrades.
Mr. Sadeghi’s sentence is lengthy even by Iranian standards, and
reflects what rights activists regard as a new trend in which relatively
unknown offenders receive long sentences, often as a warning to others.
He began his fast on Oct. 24 after his wife, Golrokh Ebrahimi-Iraee,
started serving a six-year prison term for an unpublished story found on
her private computer about a woman watching a film about a stoning and
burning a Quran in anger afterward. She was convicted on blasphemy charges.
Mr. Shariati, 30, is serving a five-year sentence for his involvement in
a 2014 protest supporting the female victims of acid attacks. He is
demanding to be released.
Their ordeals have galvanized supporters to highlight the hunger strikes
on messaging platforms, using hashtags like #savearash and #sosali. Both
became worldwide trending topics on Twitter.
The use of the hunger strike in Iran has in some ways put the government
in an embarrassing position, as it exalted the Northern Ireland hunger
strikers who once vexed the British.
The embassy of Britain in Tehran is on Bobby Sands Street, renamed for
the Provisional I.R.A. member who was imprisoned in Northern Ireland and
died in 1981 after refusing to eat for 66 days.
An Iranian journalist, Reza Dehaki, a supporter of his country’s hunger
strikes, noted that incongruity.
“In the regulations for Iranian prisons, hunger strike is against the
law, but we have a street named after #Bobby_Sands the most renowned
person who went on hunger strike! #contradiction #savearash,” Mr. Dehaki
wrote on his Twitter account.
Last Monday, a group of around 50 activists, ignoring the dangers that
come with organizing unauthorized protests in Iran, gathered in front of
Tehran’s Evin prison, where Mr. Sadeghi and Mrs. Ebrahimi-Iraee are
being held, and called for their release.
A day later, Iran’s judiciary capitulated to a crucial demand of Mr.
Sadeghi. Abbas Jafari Dolatabadi, Tehran’s prosecutor, announced that
Mrs. Ebrahimi-Iraee would be given a leave from prison. Mr. Sadeghi
ended his fast, after 72 days.
“He was brought to a hospital Saturday, after four days,” said his
lawyer, Mr. Raeesian.
The judiciary, dominated by Iran’s hard-liners, is engaged in a barely
veiled battle with the government of President Hassan Rouhani, which is
seeking to limit its powers.
Some hard-liners say the hunger strikes have been organized with Mr.
Rouhani’s tacit support to embarrass the judiciary. Last month Mr.
Rouhani released what he called a citizenship rights charter that
outlined the personal freedoms of Iranians. “The government, by giving
out such charters, is adding fuel to the fire of the hunger strikes,”
said Hamidreza Taraghi, a hard-line political analyst. “These are all
opportunities for outsiders to apply new pressure on Iran.”
The other hunger strikers are in prisons scattered across the country.
Information on their conditions is leaking out through foreign-based
human rights organizations and local opposition websites.
One of the inmates, Ayatollah Mohammad Reza Nekounam, was reported to
have been hospitalized on Saturday after 15 days of fasting, according
to his website. He is accused of having relations with “spirits,” but
supporters say he has been critical of the religious establishment.
A children’s rights activist, Saeed Shirzad, 27, has vowed not to eat
for at least a month and supporters say he had his lips sewn closed.
An open letter with his name on it, published on a Kurdish website, said
he was protesting the lack of basic rights for prisoners.
Mehdi Kukhian and Karim Chaichian, imprisoned for “spreading propaganda”
over the internet, have been on hunger strike for the last three weeks,
according to Oyan News, a website promoting the Azari language that the
Iranian authorities have sought to block. Another hunger striker, a
spiritual healer named Mohammad Ali Taheri, is accused of leading a
cult, his supporters say.
The Lebanese man sentenced to 10 years for spying, Nizar Zakka, started
a hunger strike on Dec. 8, according to the International Campaign for
Human Rights in Iran, a group based in New York.
For inmates, refusing to eat is sometimes the only way to be heard, one
prominent Iranian human rights lawyer said. “To do a hunger strike is a
last resort for inmates and political prisoners, who are arrested at
midnight, interrogated in unknown jails, under horrible pressures, while
their families witnessing the ordeals from afar, what can they do but go
on hunger strike?” said the lawyer, Nasrin Sotoudeh, who was imprisoned
herself for several years. “It is incredibly hard, but in some cases it
leads to success.”
In 2012, while serving a six-year sentence, Mrs. Sotoudeh went on a
hunger strike for 49 days after authorities refused to allow her
12-year-old daughter to leave the country. She fell into fragile health,
drinking only water mixed with salts and sugar. Her weight dropped to 95
It was the second time that Ms. Sotoudeh had stopped eating. She
declared her first hunger strike in 2010, after her family was forbidden
to visit or make phone calls. In that showdown, the authorities
capitulated after four weeks, allowing her husband and two children to
Mrs. Sotoudeh, who was given the Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought
by the European Parliament in 2012, said she was haunted by the
deprivations of those protests, even though she prevailed.
“I am over 50 years old and I have sustained several diseases, suffered
pains for different reasons physically,” she said. “But I should say the
hunger strike was the most painful experience which I have suffered in
my life and I will never forget it.”
Support Louis Proyect biography project
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: