********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

On 12/6/17 10:00 AM, Jeff via Marxism wrote:

My main concern in these regards is that leftists, especially Marxists who proudly (and justly!) assert that our understandings are scientifically supported, do not make fools of themselves when it comes to the hard sciences. If you're not really sure about a scientific fact, then please just say so and don't try to conclude that scientific claims which happen to favor your political agenda are valid for that reason. Because if you do, then in the end what you claim to be a "Marxist" position will be disproved by what is properly concluded using the scientific method, and all claims we make within the social sciences will appear no more trustworthy than our careless claims in the hard sciences.

- Jeff

The problem is with cancer, however. Trying to find an environmental smoking gun is virtually impossible. Cancer clusters are just one example. Put yourself in the position of a breast cancer victim living near a nuclear power plant. You are shit out of luck.

Even if the data indicates higher than usual contamination, how can you establish it led to thyroid or breast cancer?

The same thing is true of pesticides and herbicides. How can you establish that Monsanto is guilty of jeopardizing our health by selling products that after leaching into the soil cause bladder cancer, was the case with Sandra Steingraber?

You can certainly prove that drinking a fifth of whiskey every day can cause cirrhosis of the liver but what kind of experiment can prove that living near Indian Point causes thyroid cancer? It is only "circumstantial evidence".

Meanwhile, the best course of action is to overthrow the capitalist system and build a society based mostly on alternative energy sources. Even if the evidence is only circumstantial, that's no reason to risk the health of the human race.
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to