********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************


March 10, 2018 — Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal — After 
decisively defeating the Second Spanish Republic in 1939, the triumphant 
dictatorship of Francisco Franco presided over a regime of unbridled state 
terror, concentration camps and murder. Resistance survived during the long 
years of repression, but Franco was never beaten. By the time of Franco's death 
in 1975, the bourgeoisie recognized that fundamental reform was needed to deal 
with a militant labor movement, the leftist opposition and a mounting economic 
crisis. To that end, the post-Franco government began a process of 
“liberalization.” However, the Spanish bourgeoisie would not have been able to 
make the transition from fascism to a constitutional monarchy without the 
willing collaboration of the left-wing parties who renounced any other 
alternative in the interests of “national reconciliation.”
 
The much touted Spanish “transition to democracy” was an example of what 
Antonio Gramsci called a “passive revolution.” By passive revolution, Gramsci 
means that through the legislative intervention of the state, and by means of 
the corporative organization-relatively far-reaching modifications are being 
introduced into the country's economic structure in order to accentuate the 
"plan of production" element; in other words, that socialization and 
co-operation in the sphere of production are being increased, without however 
touching (or at least not going beyond the regulation and control of) 
individual and group appropriation of profit.[1]
 
After Franco's death, the Spanish bourgeoisie was able to achieve a “revolution 
without a revolution” since they possessed the will and the capacity to carry 
out a strategy of “democratization.” They were also able to secure the 
collaboration and support of the opposition since the left lacked a 
revolutionary and “Jacobin” strategy of their own that could lead to a 
revolutionary break. Not only did the left refuse to play a revolutionary role, 
they allowed themselves to be co-opted and absorbed by the bourgeoisie, 
ultimately ensuring a successful passive revolution in Spain.

More at:
http://links.org.au/spain-transition-democracy-passive-revolution


Jim Farmelant
http://independent.academia.edu/JimFarmelant
http://www.foxymath.com 
Learn or Review Basic Math

____________________________________________________________
After Weeks Of Rumors, Joanna Gaines Comes Clean
risingstarnewspaper.com
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/5aa3f1a43a0bd71a32451st04vuc

_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to