********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.

On 9/13/18 10:32 PM, Nick Fredman via Marxism wrote:
The Revolution in Rojava book including its account of the uprising is
based on over 150 interviews within Rojava. The account of the uprising is
also based on reports from a Vice News team which reported from Rojava a
week after the uprising. The accounts of a deal with Assad all seem to come
from keyboard warriors in the US and Europe with no direct evidence of any
deals. You can disagree with the analysis of the authors or the positions
of the Apoist movement, fine, but smart-arse sneers about Bookhin don’t
really justify continued casual slanders made with little to no evidence of
fellow socialists over being handed Rojava for free, deals with Assad,
being armed by Assad, “ethnic cleansing” and the rest.

You don't seem to get it. Bookchin has a completely different understanding of socialism than Marxists. In fact, he is openly hostile to Marxism as this online book indicates:

Listen, Marxist! (https://www.marxists.org/archive/bookchin/1969/listen-marxist.htm)

The worker becomes a revolutionary not by becoming more of a worker but by undoing his "workerness." And in this he is not alone; the same applies to the farmer, the student, the clerk, the soldier, the bureaucrat, the professional—and the Marxist. The worker is no less a "bourgeois" than the farmer, student, clerk, soldier, bureaucrat, professional—and Marxist. His "workerness" is the disease he is suffering from, the social affliction telescoped to individual dimensions. Lenin understood this in What Is to Be Done? but he smuggled in the old hierarchy under a red flag and some revolutionary verbiage.


In the midst of a cataclysmic confrontation between the Syrian poor and a brutal family dynasty, the PYD chose to cut a deal with the regime to allow its utopian experiment to proceed.

Long before the Syrian revolution began, I took apart Bookchin's anti-Marxist ideology:

Bookchin's "libertarian municipalism" is offered as an alternative to the Marxist vision of a transformation of society led by the working-class. "Social ecology would embody its ethics in a politics of confederal municipalism, in which municipalities cojointly gain rights to self-governance through networks of confederal councils, to which towns and cities would send their mandated, recallable by delegates to adjust differences."

Okay, let's see if we can get this right. Capitalism will be replaced by a more humane system through the incremental replacement of capitalist chunks of real estate by new egalitarian units. Today we have liberated Putney, Vermont and Madison, Wisconsin. Next week we have a shot at taking over Dallas, Texas. When all the towns and cities have been become liberated zones, we then celebrate our victory by eating dishes of Ben and Jerry's ice cream.

full: http://www.columbia.edu/~lnp3/mydocs/economics/neo_utopian.htm

So what in hell's name is going on with you people? Don't you realize that you are morphing into an anarchist current? Why not go whole hog and find some Bakuninites to fuse with in Australia?
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 

Reply via email to