******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ******************** #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. *****************************************************************
Best regards, Andrew Stewart Begin forwarded message: > From: H-Net Staff <revh...@mail.h-net.msu.edu> > Date: October 19, 2018 at 11:14:41 AM EDT > To: h-rev...@lists.h-net.org > Subject: H-Net Review [H-German]: Stoltzfus on Pine, 'Life and Times in Nazi > Germany' > Reply-To: H-Net Staff <revh...@mail.h-net.msu.edu> > > Lisa Pine, ed. Life and Times in Nazi Germany. New York, NY > Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016. 328 pp. $35.95 (paper), ISBN > 978-1-4742-1792-7. > > Reviewed by Nathan Stoltzfus (Florida State University) > Published on H-German (October, 2018) > Commissioned by David Harrisville > > Stoltzfus on Life and Times in Nazi Germany > > Lisa Pine, one of the most productive historians of everyday life in > Nazi Germany, has published another marker in the historiography of > ordinary Germans. Detractors have charged this alternative approach > to "big man" and structuralist interpretations with undue celebration > of "the man on the street." This collection of ten essays, rich with > research and observations, helps demonstrate that history from below > does not have to ignore other approaches. Especially when it relates > the everyday to political decision-making, it adds dimensions and not > just texture. Thus, it is especially well suited to the urgent task, > in what might be a new populist era, of confronting ordinary persons > with the question of how they contribute to the development and > sustenance of autocracy, fascist or otherwise. > > _Life and Times in Nazi Germany_ asks how ordinary persons perceived > and acted during such an extraordinary time as the Nazi period, > raising questions about whether they considered their time to be > extraordinary, and if so, when and why. While Hitler and his allies > did not succeed in constructing a _Volksgemeinschaft_ according to > their ideal, the degree to which they did gain and maintain support > from the population as long as they were providing incentives for the > majority--and at a horrendous price to others--casts a probing light > on the learned habits of our species and its trajectories. Pine's > introduction rightly emphasizes the pressures of social conformity > and the terror of nonconformity when considering whether most Germans > freely chose Nazism or were compelled by terror to accept it. Many > must have found themselves somewhere in between, given the familiar > urge to make life easier and more rewarding along with the simple > lack of experience with resistance or even nonconformity. Resistance > is also tremendously difficult given our propensity to rationalize in > ways that comfort and align self-interest with the mainstream, as > Victor Klemperer's diary points out. By the late 1930s almost all > Germans could find something to support about the Nazi dictatorship > so that, as Pine writes, dissent, complicity, and outright support > often coexisted. Not surprisingly, considering the general human > condition, Germans "were not equal to the situation," as Sebastian > Haffner observed. Drawing on familiar habits, they tried "to ignore > the situation and not allow it to disturb our fun ... to think about > unpleasant things as little as possible."[1] > > The book consists of three parts: "Food and Health," "Lifestyle," and > "Religion." Nancy Reagin, who has written on women's political > organizations before 1933, offers real insights into the everyday > life of "ordinary" Germans, in contrast to a few chapters that focus > more on elites. She explores the dictatorship's efforts to convince > Germans to embrace Nazism, using new food-processing and -storage > technologies along with enticement, lack of choice, and exhortation, > reaching the conclusion that Nazi efforts to reshape consumption and > dietary habits "were largely successful" (p. 40). Although it > considered women incapable of conducting politics, the dictatorship > encouraged women to feel empowered by touting their efforts as > critical to Germany's mission in the big, history-making world of > men, war, and conquest ("cooking spoons" became "weapons" during the > war). Reagin identifies the key role that looting from foreign > territories played in propping up the German food economy and the > paltry rations for Jewish Germans, although she did not find time or > space to deal with sources on the privations suffered by foreign > forced laborers. Looking back from the 1950s, most Germans remembered > the Nazi prewar years as a "good" period, because they themselves had > jobs and their own tables were sufficiently set. Pointing out that > alcoholics were sterilized while drug addicts were rehabilitated, > Jonathan Lewy's contribution, "Vice and the Third Reich," argues that > the Nazi approach to addiction (with the exception of alcoholism) was > remarkably liberal, treating it as a disease (although ending > addiction was promoted as a measure to stem antisocial behavior). He > mentions but does not develop the special concern the regime had in > cautioning women not to smoke. Geoffrey Cocks's study of illness in > Nazi Germany does consider the gendered nature of Nazi policies, > which included a focus on promoting women's health to increase the > population. The _Volksgemeinschaft_ was a Nazi ideal and the > leadership made decisions in light of its goal of persuading Germans > to join in constructing it. > > Irene Guenther opens the book's second section with a chapter on the > fraught Nazi relationship to women's fashion. She shows not only the > political significance of women for Nazism, but also the limitations > the regime recognized on its capacity to get its way within the Reich > by sheer brute force. Characteristically, as well, it was the Führer > who, in contrast to the cumulative radicalization that he permitted > in the persecution of the Jews, intervened to reverse coercive > measures taken by regional domestic officials that alienated the > _Volk_. Hitler, to protect his image, rescinded a Total War measure > by the minister for the economy to ban hair permanents in 1943. He > was responding to complaints from women including Eva Braun, although > as the war gobbled up chemicals, perms became increasingly rare and > expensive. Guenter demonstrates that "clothes provided a tangible > sign of inclusion in and exclusion from the _Volksgemeinschaft_" (p. > 101), as outsiders were forbidden to wear the dirndl (traditional > _Volk_ costume) or the uniforms of Nazified women's organizations, > while others were marked as outsiders on their clothing. Guenter > concludes that fashion and fashion magazines served as a smokescreen > that, like Hitler's prolonged refusal to conscript women, attempted > to create the impression that war under Nazism would not demand harsh > sacrifices. > > Kirstin Semmens's chapter on tourism is an excellent example of how > ordinary persons can align their own interests with those of tyranny, > just as they have learned to align them with power structures during > a democracy, without any thought of resistance. Semmens emphasizes > that the Nazis had a big impact on the tourism industry, concluding > that "everyday tourism" generally increased support for Hitler or at > least minimized overt resistance, even as it brutalized Jewish > professionals, some of them colleagues or associates. > _Gleichschaltung_ (alignment or coordination) of the travel industry, > Semmens finds, was often due to voluntary changes on the local level > rather than orders from above, as many tourist professionals traded > their autonomy for career advances. To the extent that tourist > professionals were a coherent group (and this could be investigated > further), Semmens shows them accepting the convenient Nazi claim that > tourism united the Germans and promoted patriotism. > > David Imhoof's essay, "Sports, Politics and Free Time," begins with > the intriguing claim that "the history of sport illustrates that Nazi > _Gleichschaltung_ (coordination) of free-time activities was a > two-way street, a process by which average Germans helped to create > the Third Reich culture as much as they had it imposed on them" (p. > 161). While the expulsion of Jews from the industry and erasure of > Jewish sites on tourist maps occurred with brutal rapidity, > _Gleichschaltung_ was a long process, as traced in Imhoof's case > study of Göttingen, having begun on the initiative of local elites > even before Hitler came to power and continuing into the mid-1930s. > While masking "Göttingen interests," townspeople playing, watching, > or writing about sports "helped turn Göttingen into a Nazi town," > Imhoff argues (p. 179). Nazi policing and taxation of organizations > made use of preexisting notions of community associated with sports > in ways that attracted Germans to the state and even prepared them > for war. > > Joan Clinefelter's chapter on art and the _Volksgemeinschaft_ argues > boldly that "culture generally and the visual arts specifically > formed the core of the _Volksgemeinschaft_" (p. 189). Before as well > as during the war, the arts "provided visual proof of the very > essence of German identity and the new society that was being > created" (p. 204). As the site of engagement between the German > people and Nazi conceptions of art, art exhibitions are of particular > interest for Clinefelter, who contends that the struggle between > Josef Goebbels and Alfred Rosenberg over German modernists largely > played out not between the two Nazi bigwigs but at the local level, > through decisions about how to stage individual art shows. > Clinefelter argues that the objective of efforts to create a uniquely > German style of art was to unite the German people and serve their > needs in a way that erased class differences, making the case that > the way visual art was presented and consumed functioned as a > mechanism for integrating the people into the national community > through participation. Art, like fashion, was a representation of > Nazi ideology: both presented modern styles as non-German, influenced > by Jews. > > This book's final section on religion concerns Protestants, > Catholics, and Christmas. To avoid a repetition of the home front > unrest that Hitler blamed for Germany's loss of World War I, the > dictatorship wanted to fight war without impinging on everyday norms > and consumption, although this became increasingly difficult with > each year of war. Conversely, churches' practice of their religious > customs generally became easier during the war, following Hitler's > resolve, delivered as an order during the first days of the war, that > all unnecessary provocations of the churches must cease. > > Opening the book's final section, on religion, Christopher Probst > rightly contrasts Protestant objections to Nazi infringement of > traditional religious practices with its occasional objections to the > persecution of the Jews. He points out that the Confessing Church did > not support Hitler's dream of establishing a Reich Church with a > Reich bishop above all other German Protestant bishops, answering to > the Führer. Because Party officials could neither turn opinion > against these bishops nor agree on how to control them, they referred > the decision to Hitler, who appeased the bishops and their churches > in order to maintain the forward momentum of his movement. The > bishops prevailed because of the public opinion they mobilized. > Probst's "Protestantism from the Margins" presents a view not so much > from social margins as from the margins of the Protestant ideological > spectrum, promulgated by elites. The focus on the Protestant > relationship to the advance of the violent persecution of the Jews > identifies the difference between antisemitism and anti-Judaism, but > more might be made of the range and types of antisemitism and the > church's relationship to Nazi biological or "racial" antisemitism. > Probst's consideration of Theodor Pauls and Hermann Maas does > illustrate the extremes of Protestant thinking about the Jews, > showing how Pauls twisted Martin Luther's writings by applying racial > concepts of antisemitism while Maas spoke out against Nazi > antisemitism and helped Jews to emigrate. One wonders whether these > elites represented the views of the Protestant masses. > > Kevin Spicer's treatment of "Catholic Life under Hitler" is also more > concerned with clergy than parishioners. Focusing on the ways in > which the clergy supported or failed to hinder the persecution of > Jews, the chapter identifies church opposition, before and during the > war, as the self-serving "preservation of their own belief system" > (p. 253). Spicer evaluates resistance in terms of moral behavior > while insights about the mechanisms that rendered some forms of > opposition more effective than others are missing. Insights into the > possibilities, extent, and limits of Catholic opposition are lost in > sweeping statements such as that Bishop Sproll "had to flee his home > ... after church-state tensions in his region threatened to become > deadly" or "the euthanasia programme actually continued > uninterrupted" (p. 253) following Galen's protest. Bishop von Galen's > protest against euthanasia "at most ... drove Catholics to mistrust > state authorities even more.... The Gestapo also acted swiftly and > mercilessly against any form of resistance" (p. 253). The > dictatorship's response to Galen's protest hardly supports this claim > about the Gestapo's reach, and on the other hand the church's failure > to resist to the extent possible is not identified. (The bishops > ignored Bishop Galen's suggestions to bring the public into > opposition by protesting from the pulpit rather than in private; each > locale that struggled against the removal of crucifixes from Catholic > schools struggled alone rather than as part of a common Catholic > front; Johannes Sproll stood alone in refusing to allow > sterilizations in the hospital of his diocese, etc.) How much will > for resistance was there considering Spicer's conclusion that most > Catholics were patriotic, loyal Germans supporting Hitler and few > questioned his racial policies? > > This book's study of the ways and extent to which the regime > succeeded in permeating German cultural and social life ends with Joe > Perry's "Christmas as Nazi Holiday." The Nazis wished to take > Christianity out of Christmas while aligning the _Volk_'s perception > of National Socialism with the Christmas mood. The dictatorship tried > to "colonize" Christmas, in the description of Perry, like other > institutions and holidays that commanded strong popular allegiance or > a positive mood. Perry does a fine job of outlining the social and > historical context of the development of the Christmas mood in > Germany before the dictatorship attempted to repurpose it as a > celebration of the _Volksgemeinschaft_. _Völkish_ and pre-Christian > solstice celebrations interpreted as reflecting the values of Nazism > were introduced probably with some success, although it is difficult > indeed to access emotions as people experienced them. > > Overall, _Life and Times in Nazi Germany_ is strong in exposing > mechanisms that drove the process of _Gleichschaltung_ and in > illustrating the development of the _Volksgemeinschaft_, coerced and > voluntary. It demonstrates the continuing vitality of everyday life > history and would be particularly useful for college courses not only > in that field but also twentieth-century German or European history, > not to mention courses in Nazi Germany. > > Note > > [1]. Sebastian Haffner, _Defying Hitler_ (New York: Farrar, Straus > & Giroux, 2000), 155. > > Citation: Nathan Stoltzfus. Review of Pine, Lisa, ed., _Life and > Times in Nazi Germany_. H-German, H-Net Reviews. October, 2018. > URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=50613 > > This work is licensed under a Creative Commons > Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States > License. > > -- _________________________________________________________ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com