********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

 (trying again . . .. .)

As in 2016, the results pose the question as to whether Donald Trump is a
political genius or the Democrats function rather like the Three Stooges
trying to build a house.  I know which option makes the most sense to me.

By all accounts on the ground, the Democrats did few of the things they
needed to do to maximize the outcome.  In Texas, where Latino votes were
key, the party did nothing to organize transportation for people to get to
the polls.  That used to be the bare minimum the organization would do.
Various organizations here and there have tried to pick up the slack--the
NAACP here, for example, but the results have been spotty.

This really reflects the transformation of political parties in the U.S.
which have come to function mostly as fund-raising organs that funnel money
into television advertising.  Look at how some of the Democratic candidates
like Stacey Abrams, Beto O'Rourke, and Andrew Gillum have earned a
reputation as exceptionally charismatic, etc.  What makes them  stand out
from the others seems to be their ability to actually stand up and talk to
other sentient human beings.  A commentary on the state of political
affairs here.

(btw, Ted Cruz has just been declared the winner in Texas, assuring
Republican control of the U.S. Senate.)

Cheers,
Mark L.
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to