********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

Louis Project wrote

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/apr/28/climate-dangerous-documentary-planet-of-the-humans-michael-moore-taken-down
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Heinberg, who is featured in the film as interviewee but who is not identified with its production or construction of its story line, gives a more balanced picture in this review https://www.filmsforaction.org/articles/richard-heinberg-review-planet-of-the-humans/. I agree with him that over all, given the limited exposure available for any documentary critical of prevailing convention, and the depth of the crisis, this documentary is worth watching. It does without question open up a lot of areas that most people, if not the more-or-less informed who are providing these critiques, are still gulled and totally uninformed about.

Of course he's right about facile technofixes and the ominous overtones of production for profit taking over the environmental movement; but my flesh creeps every time someone brings up overpopulation, as Heinberg does here and as also does this documentary, as a main problem, without more. It's left up in the air, to float around and collect all kinds of toxic reactions.

First of all, the population has increased virtually exponentially for reasons that need to be aired and explored, so that the right wing and their liberal cohorts (even some on the left) don't prevail in identifying victims as cause and being complicit in one way or another in elimination of the poor and those least able to protect themselves.

Just to review some of the considerations:

Reasons for the population explosion include of course advances in sanitation and healthcare and the fact that, until very recently, most of the world's people were in rural, peasant, farm-based communities, where the life they lived became increasingly at risk as capital drove them to the wall by monopolizing the best land and by producing massive quantities of cheap agricultural goods; and with the continuing poverty and high mortality rates, historically and concurrently and among other cultural reasons they produced more children to provide for reproduction of the products of their land and for their old age in regions with no public provision for the elderly.

Then it's readily evident that, as more fortunate nations produced more adequate foodstuffs for much of their populace, the birth rate in those places rapidly dropped, as it would anywhere, given more adequate satisfaction of needs.

And needless to say, the poor in the world are not at all the consumers of diminishing resources responsible for per capita overconsumption - rather, it's the upper and middle classes, who remain largely in denial, oblivious and culpable in these and related crimes against humanity.

Distribution of what's now produced is so skewed across the planet, so much of the arable land is given over to livestock, biofuels and other superfluouscommodities, or otherwise occupied with useless or dispensable luxury and sprawling conurban complexes, and is abused by mono-cropping, fossil fuel-based fertilizers and pesticides and clear-cut forests and dead soil. How would we know how much is enough or how many people is really too much? Certainly not by divination or by sputtering old Malthusian misconclusions.

That's not covered in the comments on this documentary that I have seen.

And the discussants don't grab on and hold fast to the ineluctable conclusion that it is neither technofixes nor even solar and wind alternatives nor individual adjustment in consumption that will solve our problems; again, it's root and branch extirpation of capital as the primary (dis)organizer of production of our needs.

I kind of identify with Vijay Prashad, that we should no longer juxtapose ourselves as the "left" against some balancing "right": we have proceeded way beyond that - capital as solution is dead, and so figuratively are its apologists.
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to