********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: H-Net Staff via H-REVIEW <h-rev...@lists.h-net.org>
Date: Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 6:28 PM
Subject: H-Net Review [H-Black-Europe]: Gallagher on Hund, 'Wie die
Deutschen weiß wurden: Kleine (Heimat) Geschichte des Rassismus'
To: <h-rev...@lists.h-net.org>
Cc: H-Net Staff <revh...@mail.h-net.org>


Wulf D. Hund.  Wie die Deutschen weiß wurden: Kleine (Heimat)
Geschichte des Rassismus.  Stuttgart  J. B. Metzler, 2017.  212 pp.
Ill.  EUR 19,99 (cloth), ISBN 978-3-476-04499-0.

Reviewed by Maureen Gallagher (Australian National University)
Published on H-Black-Europe (June, 2020)
Commissioned by Vanessa Plumly

With his 2017 _Wie die Deutschen weiß wurden_, Wulf D. Hund, an
emeritus professor of sociology at the University of Hamburg, offers
a clear, concise, historical account of the centrality of race to
German history and intellectual discourse. As the title indicates,
the book is concerned with how German whiteness is constructed, not
as a consistent or monolithic whole but rather as a gradual,
fragmented, and contested exclusionary process that intersects with
and is complicated by other forms of difference like ethnicity,
class, or religion.

The book's subtitle provocatively dubs it a _(Heimat) Geschichte _of
racism, clearly spelling out one of Hund's central arguments and
pointing to one of the book's great strengths: it firmly centers its
discussion of race, racism, whiteness, and white supremacy within
German-speaking contexts as homegrown phenomena. Hund thus chooses
not to avoid taboo words like "Rasse";[1] in this he deviates from
the norm among German-speaking race scholars, but the choice not to
avoid, anglicize, or put scare quotes around the word is clearly an
attempt to underscore his point that race does not enter Germany
through the Anglophone world or otherwise come from outside. Instead,
he shows that German whiteness "hatte in einem langwierigen und
komplizierten Prozess allererst erzeugt werden müssen. Denn von
Natur aus gibt es weder Rassen noch Weiße. Die sind ideologische
Kopfgeburten der europäischen Expansion und mit Hilfe kolonialer
Gewalt zur Welt gekommen, ehe sie im 18. Jahrhundert von der
Aufklärung systematisiert und zu wissenschaftlichen Kategorien
gemacht wurden" (p. 6).

Roughly half the book is devoted to what might be called the
prehistory of modern notions of race, the divisions and exclusions
that fall short of the kind of systematic social, cultural, and
biological approach that crystallizes in the eighteenth century. This
section of the book contains chapters devoted to the figure of the
"Kammermohr" in seventeenth-century court culture, which shows skin
color as a marker of social difference more than biological
difference and the growing connection between whiteness and wisdom
(_Weißheit_ and _Weisheit_); religious racism and its symbolic
"Farbenlehre," where dark and light are markers of good and bad--of
Christian and heathen--that don't always map neatly onto modern
notions of race or ethnicity; a history of anti-Semitism that spans
centuries, with Jews continually marked as other, though not always
in physical, biological, or racial terms; and the representation of
the Sinti and Roma peoples, which swings between the poles of
racialized perception of them as foreign and criminal and as a
romanticized illustration of a carefree existence.

The second half of the book tackles modern racism from the eighteenth
century to the near-present, with chapters devoted to racial
discourses of the Enlightenment, nineteenth-century colonialism and
the popularization of racialized images and notions of whiteness,
early twentieth-century debates about race and degeneration, Nazi
Germany, and post-WWII efforts of Germans to "wash themselves white."
At the heart of the volume is the chapter "Rassen© made in Germany;"
its position at the center of the book mirrors the central role the
European Enlightenment plays in laying the foundations for modern
racism. It is in the Enlightenment, against the background of
"Sklaverei, Kolonialismus und Kapitalismus und deren Beschönigung"
(p. 81) that race becomes recognizable in its modern form--as an
organized system of biological difference. Here Hund makes a
convincing case for the German invention of race, as Sara Eigen and
Mark Larrimore termed it in their edited volume of the same name
(2006), showing the formalization of the concept and its entrance
into scientific and academic thought through debate and discourse
from thinkers like Hegel, Herder, Kant, Soemmerring, Forster, and
Meiners (to whom we are indebted for popularizing "Caucasian" as a
generic term for white people).

In the nineteenth century, these foundations are built upon, as
colonialism becomes part of German culture and whiteness is
popularized through mass spectacles like ethnographic shows and
colonial exhibitions and what Hund terms "Warenrassismus"--the use of
racialized images in advertising campaigns (like those from Kaloderma
soap and Sarotti chocolate). While Hund's argument is convincing and
his examples are well chosen, he perhaps takes his own
subtitle--_Heimatgeschichte_--too literally, giving short shrift to
real, existing colonialism and thus glossing over the role of
colonial violence and the legal system in concretizing and enforcing
whiteness (as scholars such as Robbie Aitken, Pascal Grosse, and
Jürgen Zimmerer document). Someone unfamiliar with the history of
German colonialism might finish this chapter unable to even name
Germany's overseas territories. In another chapter, early
twentieth-century controversies like the Yellow Peril and the Black
Horror on the Rhine--occurring against the backdrop of fears about
degeneration tied to issues of class and status--demonstrate the
unifying power of whiteness at a time when whiteness was nonetheless
fragile and perforated. Hund also offers a nuanced discussion of race
and whiteness in the Third Reich and the Nazi racial state, noting
that notions of blood and "Rassenschande," fears of social
contamination, and racism against nonwhites exist alongside the fact
that concentration camps contained "zu einem großen Teil Menschen,
die gemäß der Rassennomenklatur 'weiß' waren" (p. 135). The final
chapter is a slightly fragmented account of postwar Germany's
whitewashing. Here Hund jumps from topic to topic, referencing
debates about so-called occupation babies and denazification; Turkey
and the EU; white supremacist violence, such as the murder of Amadeo
António Kiowa; and the existence of a "christliches Abendland." He
also name-drops films like _Quax in Afrika_ and _Toxi_ and figures
like Marie Nejar (a Black German who performed under the stage name
Leila Negra) and the controversial Thilo Sarrazin, without discussing
any of this in great detail. He nonetheless convincingly shows how
"der politische Prozess des Weißwaschens wurde durch die
Mobilisierung rassistischer Differenz unterstützt" (p. 153) and the
long history of race and racialization in Germany is suppressed,
which results in racist incidents in the present day tending to be
dismissed as merely the product of ignorance rather than deep-seated
structures. In spite of the Germans having been "international
diskreditier[t]" (p. 153) after the Second World War and the events
of the Holocaust, they nonetheless retained their whiteness and were
able to obtain absolution in the form of a "Persilschein," the
colloquial term for a denazification certificate.

It is perhaps not groundbreaking to observe, as Hund does, that
German racism comes from the "Mitte der Gesellschaft" (p. 163) or
that "der alltägliche Rassismus ist in all seinen Formen Teil der
deutschen Geschichte wie der deutschen Gegenwart" (p. 164), but Hund
nonetheless makes an important contribution to the scholarship
precisely because he has written an account of the long history of
race, racism, and white supremacy in Germany that is both
comprehensive and accessible to a nonspecialist audience. Each
chapter begins with a color reproduction of an artwork that is
analyzed in detail to illustrate the central point of the chapter.
These short, jargon-free chapters can easily stand alone and be used
in an undergraduate classroom. The real weakness of the book is its
failure to meaningfully discuss the contributions of People of Color
in Germany to understanding not only race and racism but also
whiteness within and beyond the German context, such as those of
Maisha-Maureen Auma, Grada Kilomba, and Peggy Piesche, who along with
Susan Arndt published the book _Mythen, Masken und Subjekte:
Kritische Weißseinsforschung in Deutschland_ in 2005, the first
German-language contribution to the field of critical whiteness
studies. I would thus recommend that those who wish to make use of
this work in the classroom supplement it with texts like Fatma
Aydemir and Hengameh Yaghoobifarah's _Eure Heimat ist unser Albtraum_
(2019), Mohamed Amjahid's _Unter Weißen_ (2017), Tupoka Ogette's
_exit Racism_ (2017), or Noah Sow's _Deutschland Schwarz Weiß_
(2008, updated edition 2018) that place the experiences of People of
Color in Germany at the center of the critique.

Note

[1]. Note, for example, Reni Eddo-Lodge's _Why I'm No Longer Talking
to White People About Race_ appears in German as _Warum ich nicht
länger mit Weißen über Hautfarbe spreche. _

Citation: Maureen Gallagher. Review of Hund, Wulf D., _Wie die
Deutschen weiß wurden: Kleine (Heimat) Geschichte des Rassismus_.
H-Black-Europe, H-Net Reviews. June, 2020.
URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=51540

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States
License.




-- 
Best regards,

Andrew Stewart
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to