******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************
NY Times Op-Ed, July 11, 2020
The Left Is Remaking the World
“Defund the police” and “cancel rent” aren’t reforms, but paths to
revolution.
By Amna A. Akbar
Ms. Akbar is a law professor who studies leftist social movements.
The uprisings in response to the killing of George Floyd are far
different from anything that has come before. Not just because they may
be the largest in our history, or that seven weeks in, people are still
in the streets (even if the news media has largely moved on). But also
because, for the last few years, organizers have been thinking boldly.
They have been pushing demands — from “defund the police” to “cancel
rent” to “pass the Green New Deal” — that would upend the status quo and
redistribute power from elites to the working class. And now ordinary
people are, too; social movements have helped spread these demands to a
public mobilized by the pandemic and the protests.
These movements are in conversation with one another, cross-endorsing
demands as they expand their grass-roots bases. Cancel the rent
campaigns have joined the call to defund the police. This month, racial,
climate and economic justice organizations are hosting a four-day crash
course on defunding the police.
Each demand demonstrates a new attitude among leftist social movements.
They don’t want to reduce police violence, or sidestep our
environmentally unsustainable global supply chain, or create grace
periods for late rent. These are the responses of reformers and policy
elites.
Instead, the people making these demands want a new society. They want a
break from prisons and the police, from carbon and rent. They want
counselors in place of cops, housing for all and a jobs guarantee. While
many may find this naïve, polls, participation in protests and growing
membership in social movement organizations show these demands are
drawing larger and larger parts of the public toward a fundamental
critique of the status quo and a radical vision for the future.
Consider the appeal to defund and dismantle the police, championed by
almost every major social movement organization on the left, from the
Black Visions Collective to Mijente to the Sunrise Movement, and echoed
on the streets.
Defunding, part of a strategy to eventually abolish the police,
challenges the prevailing logic of police reform: the idea that police
brutality is caused by individual bad apples acting without sufficient
oversight and training. This idea undergirds the familiar panoply of
reforms: body cameras, community policing, implicit bias workshops. If
officers are properly equipped and controlled, there will be less
violence, its proponents argue — despite no significant evidence to back
that up.
Defunding suggests the problem is not isolated, nor is it a result of a
few officers’ attitudes. It challenges the power, the resources and the
enormous scope of the police. Whether they are responding to a mental
health emergency or deployed to a protest, their training and tools are
geared toward violence.
The demand for defunding suggests, as the police and prison abolitionist
Rachel Herzing often says, that the only way to reduce police violence
is to reduce police officers’ opportunities for contact with the public.
The protests have forced us to rethink state-sanctioned violence as our
default response to social problems, to reconsider the hundreds of
billions of dollars we have spent on prisons and the salaries of more
than 800,000 sworn law enforcement officers.
The uprisings have also expanded the space for a reckoning with the
failures of liberal reforms and with the possibility of doing things in
radically different ways. Tinkering and training cannot fix our reliance
on police officers to deal with routine social problems through violence
and the threat of it.
The demand for defunding calls into question the fundamental premise of
policing: that it produces safety. It urges us to take collective
responsibility for collective care, repair and redress. It shifts our
vantage point on persistent problems: for example, to guarantee housing
for all rather than to continue to arrest and cage this country’s more
than 567,000 homeless people.
The call to defund the police is often accompanied by a call to shift
resources elsewhere, to education, housing and health care. The pandemic
has put on display the spectacular contradiction such appeals reveal. We
have no guaranteed health care, wages, housing or food; we can’t even
provide personal protective equipment. These failures have devastated
Black communities in particular.
But then, in response to Black Lives Matter protests, the police show up
in high-tech gear and military-style vehicles to arrest, gas and
bludgeon protesters, demonstrating where our tax dollars have gone
instead. The demand for defunding shifts power and our imaginations away
from the police and toward a society rooted in collective care for
ordinary people. It brings into sharp relief who we have allowed
ourselves to become and offers a vision for who we could be.
Taking money away from the police is not the sole demand. Consider the
push to cancel rent. It asks the state to abolish tenants’ obligations
to pay their landlords each month. But rent is the product of a private
contract about private property: the foundation of our social, economic
and political order.
So when organizers make the demand to cancel rent, they are conjuring up
a state whose primary allegiance is to people’s needs instead of profit.
The demand raises the possibility of a world where housing is an
entitlement rather than a commodity. It aims to shift power from
landlords to tenants, in the service of visions of housing for all.
Or consider the environment. The Green New Deal does not merely call for
less pollution. It requires that we restructure our economy so we can
move to clean, renewable energy sources and net-zero greenhouse gas
emissions.
To get there, the Green New Deal calls for enormous investments in
public transit, universal health care, free public college tuition and
millions of high-wage green jobs. It emphasizes that everyone ought to
carry out its projects, with a central role for working-class people of
color. The bill’s vision is so counter to the actual practices of the
state, and to the talking points of the Democratic and Republican
Parties, you have to stretch your imagination to understand it. And that
is the point.
Organizers often call these demands “non-reformist reforms,” a term
coined in the 1960s by the French socialist André Gorz. Reform on its
own is a tired continuation of liberal politics and legalism,
expert-driven and elite-centered. Even now, policing experts are
grasping to turn the energy around ‘defund’ toward the same old reforms,
and mayors are endorsing superficial budget cuts, diluting the bold demands.
The way to respond is to stay focused on building mass movements of
ordinary people who are serious about restoring and redistributing
social wealth, as the Red Nation’s Red Deal puts it, to those who
created it: “workers, the poor, Indigenous peoples, the global South,
women, migrants, caretakers of the land, and the land itself.” Here,
too, you see the connections — among Indigenous resistance,
environmental justice and more.
Leftist movements today see our crises as intersectional. Police
violence, global warming and unaffordable housing are not disconnected,
discrete problems; instead, they emerge from colonialism and capitalism.
Organizers recall these histories, and tell stories of freedom struggles.
And whatever you think of their demands, you have to be in awe of how
they inaugurate a new political moment, as the left offers not just a
searing critique, but practical ladders to radical visions. These
capacious demands create the grounds for multiracial mass movements, our
only hope for a more just future.
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at:
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com