I suspect that Jerry Cohen would
not have minded if people took
note of his passing by debating
the merits of his works.

Actually, I find his reading
of Marx to have been closer
to the readings that were 
provided by such Second
International Marxists like
Kautsky and Plekhanov.  
I believe that
somewhere in KMTH he makes
such an acknowledgement.
But yet he did seem to have
to come to such a reading by way
of Althusser, even though
he rejected Althusserianism.

G.A. Cohen discussed Althusser
in his foreword to KMTH. There,
after detailing some of the
positive contributions of the 
Althusserians to Marxism
(which for Cohen included the re-emphasis 
on Marx's more mature writings like 
*Capital* rather than the earlier
writings like the 1844 Manuscripts 
and the attention that
Althusser and his followers paid to 
historical materialism) then
proceeded to note what he regarded 
as some of their more negative attributes.

Writing thus:

"Above all, I found much of *Lire Capital* critically vague. It
is perhaps a matter for regret that logical positivism, with its
insistence on precision of intellectual commitment, never
caught on in Paris. Anglophone philosophy left logical positivism
behind long ago, but it is lastingly the better for having engaged
with it. The Althusserian vogue could have unfortunate consequences
for Marxism in Britain, where lucidity is a precious heritage, and
where it is not generally supposed that a theoretical statement,
to be one, must be hard to comprehend."

Alas, one consequence of Cohen's work was to revive the
very sort of mechanical materialism that Althusser had
rejected along with humanist Marxism, but which
the young Jerry Cohen seems to have imbibed along with his
mother's milk, having been born and raised within
the milieu of the Canadian CP. Cohen, himself, years
later, came to see the inadequacy of this type of historical
materialism but seemed to draw the conclusion that the
problem laid with historical materialism in general rather
than with the specific variety of historical materialism
that he had embraced.

Jim Farmelant
---------- Original Message ----------
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Marxism] G.A. Cohen died this morning
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:29:07 -0400

Perhaps this is not the most tasteful time to debate the merit of his works,
but, since its up there, I think we ought to reconsider the life and work of GA
Cohen.





____________________________________________________________
Cheap Airfare from $49
Airfare Rates Just Dropped! Book Now to Lock In the Best Deals.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/c?cp=e-NnxyQ2nbKj1NNHIraWTgAAJ1BRugI4sJACAWmXIev8NAFPAAUAAAAAAAAAALUJCT6nwpnKG3LiNI2I7H3GfCHQAAAAAA==

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to