David, 

Actually, Max Schactman WAS one of those out of touch New York intellectuals? I 
was referring to!

The fact that the SWP had him in charge of their "Negro Question" work proves 
my point!

The SWP was the source of Trotsky's half baked and incorrect information on the 
"Negro Question" in America - and they were a lily White organization with 
almost no contact with Black Americans (despite the fact that they were 
headquartered in a city - New York - with a huge African American population) - 
and damned little contact with New York workers in general - even White New 
York workers.

One of the great tragedies of our movement - and the great historic tragedy of 
Trotskyism - is that Trotsky's life was entrusted to the SWP (and alleged NKVD 
double agent George Hansen - who later allegedly became an FBI informant - was 
probably responsible for the NKVD being able to kill Trotsky - and also 
probably was involved with the FBI's murder of Malcolm X).

But besides the role that a leading SWP cadre more likely than not played in 
Trotsky's physical death was the SWP's ideological toxin that infected what we 
now know as Trotskyism almost from birth.

The SWP had HUGE ideological problems - 

For example, channelling the 1934 Minneapolis strikes away from revolt against 
capitalism and safely into the arms of the labor racketeers of the 
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, the AFofL and the Chicago Outfit (the 
mafia family founded by Al Capone) in Minneapolis (the SWP all but 
singlehandedly revived the dying IBT - a rotten racist gangster union that 
barely had 75,000 members in 1934 but - thanks to the SWP's hard work - had 
400,000 workers safely under the thumb of mafia connected right wing union 
bosses by 1939) - this is, by far, the worst crime against the American working 
class the SWP ever committed, because without a revived IBT there is no revived 
AFofL and the CIO doesn't come safely back into the camp of business unionism.

It says volumes about the SWP's isolation from rank and file workers, even in 
Minneapolis, that, after the gangsters who ran the Teamsters ousted the 
Trotskyists from their leading positions in the Teamsters, there was no mass 
base of trotskyst truckdrivers - basically, the SWP ran the Minneapolis 
Teamsters because they controlled the union as an institution - they - probably 
deliberately - failed to win even a tiny fraction of Minneapolis workers to 
bolshevik leninism.

And, thanks to the heavy SWP influence in the 4th International (especially 
after Stalin and Hitler murdered most of the Trotskyists of Continental Europe 
- and Mao and Ho Chi Minh slaughtered their counterparts in East Asia) what we 
now know as Trotskyism is shot through with all of the reactionary, non 
revolutionary and liberal racist ideas of the SWP.

The NKVD may have murdered Trotsky physically - but the SWP killed him 
ideologically

Gregory A. Butler



Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:04:04 -0700
From: nada <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Marxism] Words (was 'Alexander Cocburn RIP')
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hey Greg! Good to "see" you "here"...

Ok, first, it's not as if this essay on a communist America was his 
first word on the question of race. In fact he had some great 
discusisons with Trotskyists like CLR James, Max Shachtman (who headed 
up the CP's Youth work on the "Negro Quesiton") and others. The majority 
of the people he spoke with, with the exception of Shachtman and James 
were not part of the NY Intellectual crowd. They were in fact union 
militants or ex-union members now full time SWPers.

His discussions on race, and they were discussions, not "proclamations" 
really, show both Trotsky's ignorance and profound political 
understanding at the same time of the Negro Question...including, and 
most notably, the *failure* of the American Trotskyists to address the 
issue as well as the need to...confront the Klan and Jim Crow. Both are 
in fact taken up by Trotsky in these discussions.

I was once confronted in Boston by a CPer who suggested that Trotsky was 
a dog for referring to "American workers as "pigs"..." In fact, he was 
talking about the white-racist chauvinist worker who attacks the "Negro 
worker" instead of the boss. He noted that 99% of American white workers 
are chauvinist. He doesn't mince words. This is also the case with the 
broader class-struggle milieu that the SWP often worked inside various 
unions.

Peace,

David





 

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to