Twisting nothing. Here's what you wrote:
"Please realize that the example of Cincinnatus can be counterposed by the example of the Tribunus Plebis (e. g. the Gracchi), which figure to become definitely effective had to turn itself into - Imperator!!! It is seldom forgotten that the power of the Imperator, initially, came from the remains of the Popular party, which was the characteristic party of the Tribuni Plebis" Peoples' tribune to Imperator-- the populist backing for authoritarianism is not a new, nor is it "progressive," and it is no analysis of the economic, material conditions that spawn the populism and the Bonaparte, and convert the former into camp followers of the latter. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nestor Gorojovsky" <[email protected]> To: "David Schanoes" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 6:08 PM Subject: Re: [Marxism] Bonapartism [Re: Chavez was right [was: RE: Chávez and Holocaust indifference]] No, S. Artesian. You are twisting my argument. ________________________________________________ YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: [email protected] Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
