(thunderbolts .com)

Say What?
Oct 16, 2009

The Large Hadron Collider has met with a few unforeseen accidents.  
Could they be a bizarre case of sabotage?
Particle physicists began thinking about the Large Hadron Collider  
(LHC) early in the 1980s. The LHC's predecessor, the Large Electron  
Positron Collider (LEP) would soon be coming to the end of its useful  
life, and a higher energy device was needed to investigate the so- 
called Higgs boson, a yet to be seen component in the theory of  
quantum mechanics. However, it was in 1994 that the project was  
finally approved by the 20 nation membership of CERN, inaugurating the  
start of engineering and design work.

The LHC occupies a 27 kilometer long, circular tunnel, straddling the  
border between Switzerland and France. Its powerful electromagnets are  
designed to compress and accelerate a narrow stream of protons, split  
it into dual, counter-rotating beams, and then collide those beams  
head on. Full power to the magnets was scheduled for mid-2007, with  
the first collisions to begin shortly thereafter.

On March 27, 2007, one of the focusing magnets failed when a high- 
pressure test was conducted. A chain of events resulted in the 20-ton  
magnet shifting off its foundation, filling the tunnel with helium gas  
and dust, and causing damage to 24 other magnets. The accident has  
meant waiting an additional two years until November 2009 before they  
will restart the system.

At the time of the accident, Pier Oddone, Fermilab's director,  
admitted to being "dumbfounded" that they had missed a "simple balance  
of forces" in the design, as well as in four engineering reviews. This  
latest accident, while the most costly by far ($21 million for  
repairs), is not the first one visited on the LHC.

The alarm systems repeatedly generate false alarms, alarm avalanches,  
and incorrect alarms. Major project failures have occurred, resulting  
in the cancelation of physics experiments. Increasingly high computer  
resources have been required to remove signal noise. The design is so  
delicate it requires extreme quiet. A 600 kilowatt cryogenic  
compressor was accidentally destroyed. Fires have broken out.



These and numerous other delays and annoyances have caused two  
theoretical physicists to write a paper suggesting a reason. No one  
but one of the paper's authors, Holger Bech Nielsen, of the Niels Bohr  
Institute in Copenhagen, can put it more succinctly:

“It must be our prediction that all Higgs producing machines shall  
have bad luck... Well, one could even almost say that we have a model  
for God.” It is their guess, said Dr. Nielsen, “that He rather hates  
Higgs particles, and attempts to avoid them.” In other words, either  
God or some other force in the future is sending negative influences  
back through time, so that the discovery of the Higgs boson can never  
take place.

Nielsen and Masao Ninomiya of the Yukawa Institute for Theoretical  
Physics in Kyoto, Japan, are authors of several papers discussing this  
unorthodox theory: “Search for Future Influence From LHC,” for instance.



Influences from the future attempting to prevent something from taking  
place in the past—our present—to ensure the creation of that future?  
The discovery of the Higgs boson is, according to Nielsen and  
Ninomiya, so antithetical to the future's existence that the future is  
protecting itself by causing the machines capable of finding the  
particle to fail or never be built.

As mentioned in a previous Picture of the Day, it is not the intent of  
the Thunderbolts Project to unduly criticize those who earn their  
daily bread in the employ of University laboratories or government- 
backed research institutes. In this case, though, to have Dr. Nielson,  
one of the originators of string theory, and a respected theoretician,  
publish a paper that seriously considers time travel and clairvoyant  
effects from a preexisting future to be a reason for the failure of  
machines like the LHC smacks of irony.

Stephen Smith




________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to