There is the little matter of the maker of that motion failing to point out that the picket of this meeting was in fact the SFLC's Labor Day breakfast. A detail he only owned up to after being challenged and then admitting "he forgot". If you know the maker of the motion, his reputations is one of "smoke and mirrors". The majority of the people at the Coalition meeting were unaware that his was a SFLC event. We would be picketing the SFLC...in fact one of the groups the Coalition was seeking to bring INTO the coalition.
I agree it's a tactical question which, if the motion had been presented honestly, which it was not, this would of been a non-event. But dishonestly turned this into a "huge decades long appearance of a debate" because of do-nothing liberal Alexander Cockburn lining up with one side of this conflict when he was totally abstenionist until fed the information by the maker of the motion. ...and here we are. David ________________________________________________ YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: [email protected] Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
