On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:40:52 -0500 Louis Proyect <[email protected]> writes:
> Marv Gandall wrote:
> > The CP was uniformally opposed to the Panthers' program and 
> tactics in much
> > the same way the SWP was. Within both organizations, however, 
> there were
> > members who had a more tolerant approach to the Panthers and those 
> who could
> > barely contain their hostility - often corresponding to whether 
> they were
> > working class veterans of the 30's who formed the core of the 
> leadership or
> > younger 60's activists who had occasion for more frequent contact 
> with the
> > BBP in common milieus. 
> 
> That was true initially but by 1970 all the Trotskyist youth had 
> become 
> fed up with the Panthers. With their Maoist "serve the people" crap, 
> 
> with their braggadocio, with their sexism (agreeing with Stokely 
> Carmichael the only position for women in the movement is "prone"), 
> with 
> their tendency to declare people counter-revolutionary at the drop 
> of a hat.
> 

It is perhaps telling that David Horowitz was gravitating
towards the Panthers precisely at the time that
most of the radical left was running the other way.

Jim F. 
____________________________________________________________
Medical Insurance Quotes
Compare medical insurance companies and save money now.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/c?cp=FkdMopCGrXsU2pwSAiiorgAAJ1BRugI4sJACAWmXIev8NAFPAAQAAAAFAAAAAB3JmD4AAAMlAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABJQNgAAAAA=

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to