======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


NY Times, December 11, 2009
In Iran, Protests Gaining a Radical Tinge
By ROBERT F. WORTH

BEIRUT, Lebanon — In the video, one of hundreds filmed during Iran’s
nationwide demonstrations on Monday, an enraged woman’s voice can be heard
as a paramilitary truck runs a motorbike off the road amid a crowd of
fleeing protesters.

“This is the Islamic Republic!” she shouts, gesturing at the vehicle.

That message has grown increasingly common in recent protests, as
demonstrators have made it clear that their target is not just President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, or the disputed election that returned him to power
in June, but the entire foundation of Iran’s theocracy.

During Monday’s demonstrations, the civil tone of many earlier rallies was
noticeably absent. There was no sign of the opposition leader Mir Hussein
Moussavi, a moderate figure who supports change within the system, and few
were wearing the signature bright green of his campaign.

Instead, the protesters, most of them young people, took direct aim at
Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, chanting, “Khamenei knows
his time is up!” They held up flags from which the “Allah” symbol — added
after Iran’s 1979 revolution — had been removed. Most shocking of all,
some burned an image of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the father of the
revolution.

That creeping radicalization has underscored the rift within Iran’s
opposition movement, analysts say, and poses a problem for its leaders,
including Mr. Moussavi and the reformist cleric Mehdi Karroubi.

“The longer this goes on, the more difficult will it be for the likes of
Moussavi and Karroubi to sustain their current position,” said Ray Takeyh,
an Iran expert at the Council on Foreign Relations who has worked for the
State Department. “They have to at some point opt for regime survival or
become the leaders of an opposition movement calling for more than
reform.”

Some in Iran have even speculated that Mr. Moussavi and Mr. Karroubi were
uncomfortable with the most recent round of protests, which were timed to
coincide with a holiday commemorating the killing of three students by the
shah’s forces in 1953. While they were involved with earlier protests, the
opposition leaders did not organize the most recent ones. They do not
appear to have attended any of them and have been silent since. It is not
clear how much influence they have over the movement, which often seems to
be built more around semi-spontaneous mobilizations over Facebook and Web
networks than with the aid of any clear leadership.

The aggressive tone of Monday’s protests may partly reflect the fact that
they took place on and around university campuses, where radical sentiment
is more common.

But students have long been central to social movements in Iran, where the
population is now overwhelmingly young; as Mr. Moussavi himself pointed
out last weekend, 1 in 20 Iranians is a student. And this week’s protests,
in at least a dozen cities and towns across Iran, were much broader than
the ones that shook Iran in 1999, said Rasool Nafisi, an academic and Iran
expert at Strayer University in Virginia.

Even before the latest round of protests, a number of high-ranking figures
in Iran had taken note of the opposition’s trend toward radicalism. Over
the weekend, Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, an influential former
president, warned in a speech that “the young and the elite have been
estranged from the regime” and criticized the government for using the
Revolutionary Guards and the Basij militia against protesters.

Mr. Rafsanjani, a founder of the Islamic Republic who has provided crucial
support for the opposition since the election, added pointedly that “there
are some conservatives who think the people’s vote is just a decoration.”
He admonished this group, saying, “If they want us to rule, we will; if
they don’t, we will go.”

Other leaders have also called for a greater spirit of compromise from the
government. Among them is a prominent conservative cleric, Grand Ayatollah
Naser Makarem Shirazi, who noted last week in remarks to I.S.N.A., a
semiofficial news agency, that a “large number” of people had voted
against Mr. Ahmadinejad and that “we should sit together and negotiate.”

But the government’s response to Monday’s demonstrations was anything but
conciliatory. Many witnesses said the police and Basij militia members
were more aggressive than at any time since last summer, beating
protesters with chains and truncheons and arresting hundreds of them in
cities across Iran.

In the days after the protests, hard-liners stepped up their warnings. On
Thursday, the intelligence minister, Heidar Moslehi, lashed out at Mr.
Rafsanjani and accused him of siding with those who oppose the Islamic
system, in comments reported by Fars, another semiofficial news agency.

“Shockingly, Rafsanjani expresses the same ideas as the leaders of the
conspiracy,” Mr. Moslehi said.

The intelligence minister also seemed to throw down the gauntlet to
moderates, accusing them of joining the assault on Ayatollah Khamenei.

“A lot of forces that were expected to support the supreme leader instead
went with those who rose against the supreme leader,” he said.

One prominent conservative who has been critical of Mr. Ahmadinejad,
Habibollah Asgaroladi, said the opposition had grown more
“antirevolutionary,” the Khabar Online Web site reported.

Many in the opposition have echoed those warnings, from the other side.

“The regime is on a path which threatens its own survival,” declared the
Iranian Writers’ Society, in a statement released Tuesday and posted on
opposition Web sites. “Those who sow the wind will harvest a typhoon.”




________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to