====================================================================== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. ======================================================================
I am a bit confused: The issues on education that were put by the opposing sections seemed both respectful and mindful on both sides, of the distinction between reformist steps and reovelutionary steps. While accepting that reformist measures are at times, to be accepted by the revolutionary movement. Yet I see no semblance of that un-emotive (and open-minded) tone in the current discussion on the patently inadequate health bills. Would someone (preferably at least one of the more dogmatic people here who insist that there is no value *at all* in the bill) explain to me what reforms are "acceptable" and what ones are not? Hari Kuamr > > > 6. Re: WSWS: (Thomas Bias) > 7. Re: WSWS: Socialism and the defense of public education > (S. Artesian) > ________________________________________________ Send list submissions to: [email protected] Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
