======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/31/AR2009123100541.html
CIA base attacked in Afghanistan supported airstrikes against al-Qaeda, 
Taliban

By Joby Warrick and Pamela Constable
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 1, 2010; A01

The CIA base attacked by a suicide bomber in Afghanistan this week was 
at the heart of a covert program overseeing strikes by the agency's 
remote-controlled aircraft along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, 
officials familiar with the installation said Thursday.

The assailant, wearing an explosives belt under his clothes, apparently 
was allowed to enter the small base after offering to become an 
informant, according to two former agency officials briefed on the 
attack. The CIA declined to comment on the circumstances behind the 
incident, and it was unclear whether the bomber chose the base because 
of its role in supporting CIA airstrikes against top al-Qaeda and 
Taliban leaders in the region.

The blast early Wednesday evening in the eastern province of Khost 
killed seven CIA officers and contractors, including the base chief, and 
seriously wounded six others in what intelligence officials described as 
a devastating blow to one of the agency's key intelligence hubs for 
counterterrorism operations. It was the deadliest single day for the 
agency since eight CIA officers were killed in the 1983 bombing of the 
U.S. Embassy in Beirut.

The CIA continued drone strikes Thursday. A security official in 
Pakistan confirmed that two militants were killed late in the day in 
what was described as a missile attack by a Predator drone in Pakistan's 
autonomous North Waziristan region, across the border from Khost.

The official said the missile destroyed the home of a man believed to be 
linked to the extremist group Tehrik-e-Taliban. The CIA has consistently 
declined to acknowledge any participation in the ongoing campaign of 
airstrikes that killed more than 300 people in the past 12 months.

U.S. intelligence officials vowed that the Wednesday attack would only 
increase the agency's resolve. "This attack will be avenged through 
successful, aggressive counterterrorism operations," said one official, 
speaking on the condition of anonymity.

The CIA deaths were formally acknowledged by the agency in a statement 
to employees Thursday by Director Leon E. Panetta, who said the heavy 
toll was a reminder of the "real danger" that confronts intelligence 
officers on the fronts of the two wars. CIA operatives in Afghanistan 
volunteer for the posting and spend a year or more on assignment. Many 
of the slain -- including the base chief, a mother of three young 
children -- were seasoned hands in the agency's counterterrorism operations.

"Those who fell yesterday were far from home and close to the enemy, 
doing the hard work that must be done to protect our country from 
terrorism," Panetta said in his message to employees. "We owe them our 
deepest gratitude, and we pledge to them and their families that we will 
never cease fighting for the cause to which they dedicated their lives 
-- a safer America." Panetta said military doctors and nurses had saved 
the lives of gravely wounded officers, and he announced that flags at 
CIA headquarters in Langley would be flown at half-staff to honor the dead.

As is customary, the CIA declined to identify the victims. Director of 
National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair did not publicly comment on the 
deaths, but a spokesman said he sent an internal, classified message 
expressing his condolences.

President Obama posted a letter to CIA employees honoring those killed, 
whom he called "part of a long line of patriots who have made great 
sacrifices for their fellow citizens, and for our way of life."
'Sloppy' screening

U.S. personnel at the site of the attack, Forward Operating Base 
Chapman, are heavily involved in the selection of al-Qaeda and Taliban 
targets for drone aircraft strikes, according to two former intelligence 
officials who have visited the facility. The drones themselves are flown 
from separate bases in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Because of its location 
near a hotbed of insurgent activity, the base is also a center for 
recruiting and debriefing informants, the officials said, and it would 
not be unusual for local Afghans to be admitted to the facility for 
questioning.

"There's still a lot to be learned about what happened. All the facts 
are not in," CIA spokesman George Little said. "The key lesson is that 
counterterrorism work is dangerous."

A Taliban spokesman asserted responsibility Thursday for the bombing and 
said the bomber was an Afghan National Army officer who had joined 
insurgents in attacking the United States. That description could not be 
confirmed with U.S. military officials. But a U.S. military official in 
Afghanistan, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said Afghan forces 
are posted at the base.

Forward operating bases in Afghanistan depend on locals for security. 
But insurgents have frequently infiltrated the ranks of Afghan security 
forces as well as private firms hired to guard U.S. facilities or to 
perform more menial tasks. CIA officials on Thursday would not discuss 
what guard service they had at the base.

Thomas Ruttig, co-director of the Afghanistan Analysts Network, said 
that this week's attack once again shows that there "needs to be much 
better screening of people joining the Afghan security forces. . . . I 
know from visits in Afghan provinces this is done in a very sloppy way."

The danger of infiltration, he added, could increase as the U.S. 
military seeks to develop "community defense forces."
Severed communication

Forward Operating Base Chapman is a former Afghan army installation and 
was used jointly by American and Afghan security forces during their 
military campaign against the Taliban beginning in 2001. In recent 
years, the base added an intelligence-gathering function and had a 
housing compound for U.S. intelligence officers. It was physically 
separate from the main U.S. military base nearby, Forward Operating Base 
Salerno.

Senior Afghan civilian officials in Khost said that they knew little 
about what went on at Chapman and that since Wednesday's attack, they 
have been unable to reach anyone inside by phone. Afghan interpreters 
working on the base at the time have since been incommunicado, and those 
who were on leave that day have not been allowed back inside, according 
to Khost residents and officials reached by phone.

A spokesman for the Afghan National Army in Kabul denied that the Khost 
attack was carried out by a member of the army, but the possibility 
highlights growing concerns in Afghanistan and Pakistan about whether it 
is possible to sustain the loyalty and unity of their respective armies. 
The Afghan army, a crucial element in the new U.S. strategy in 
Afghanistan, is young, untested and ethnically diverse. It is being 
asked to fight fellow Muslims from the dominant Afghan tribe in an 
unpopular war on behalf of American forces and policies that many 
Afghans deeply resent.

"This attack shows that the Taliban are getting good cooperation from 
the locals and that they have better intelligence than the Americans 
do," said Talat Masood, a Pakistani security analyst and retired general 
in Islamabad, Pakistan's capital. "It also raises the issue that has 
haunted the Afghan National Army from the beginning -- whether or not it 
is possible to build a unified army that can overcome ethnic loyalties 
in support of broader American goals."

Staff writers Karen DeYoung, Walter Pincus and Peter Finn in Washington, 
correspondent Karin Brulliard in Islamabad and staff researcher Julie 
Tate in Washington contributed to this report.

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to