======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


Counterpunch Weekend Edition
January 1 - 3, 2010
Why Men Really Read Playboy
The Talboidization of the Media

By DAVID MACARAY

Some men used to pretend they read Playboy magazine for its fiction—an 
utterly transparent and pathetic rationalization meant to disguise a 
perfectly natural interest in naked women.

The Huffington Post evokes a similar rationalization.  Where Playboy was 
a skin magazine that offered “shelter” in the form of quality fiction, 
HuffPo is a beehive of frivolous pop culture that purports to be an 
intellectual journal.  We can go there without feeling guilty, as if 
we’re visiting Foreign Affairs’ little brother.

While HuffPo does, undeniably, offer some intellectual sobriety, most of 
the material is devoted to glamour, attitude, faux-trends, sex scandals, 
predictions, smug irony and sophomoric humor (“Douchebag of the year 
awards”).  And if you don’t think Arianna considers the site to be 
high-brow, listen to her on the panel shows; she portrays it as the 
Internet version of a 19th century literary salon.

Its success shouldn’t surprise anyone.  In addition to the wide 
assortment of celebrity buzz and glitterati, you get political 
commentary from movie stars and Hollywood wags (Alec Baldwin, Clay 
Aiken, Andy Borowitz, Jamie Lee Curtis, Harry Shearer, et al).  Instead 
of some obscure college professor writing about Afghanistan, you get 
Bill Maher writing about it.

HuffPo’s popularity coincides with that of cable television’s, History 
Channel, which, given its staid, no-nonsense title—and if you didn’t 
know any better—would lead you to believe it was dedicated to the 
straightforward, even scholarly treatment of….well, history.  But after 
catching a few episodes of “Ancients Behaving Badly,” you realize that 
isn’t the case.  Edward Gibbon it ain’t.

Yet, there are people who boast that they wouldn’t waste their time 
watching sappy movies or network sitcoms, preferring instead the History 
Channel—suggesting that their goal in life is to improve rather than 
amuse themselves.  Alas, what they’re really saying is that they have a 
well-developed Hitler fetish.

An early example of tabloid TV is 60 Minutes.  Until the show was 
exposed, back in the eighties, and CBS was forced to discontinue the 
practice, they used what were called “inserts.”  An insert is a device 
intended to make the correspondents (particularly Mike Wallace) appear 
tougher on screen.

The way it worked was for Wallace to ask the guest a controversial or 
embarrassing question and get him/her to answer it.  Then, after the 
guest left, Wallace would reshoot the scene, asking the identical 
question, but in a much different manner.  This time he would be shown 
asking it aggressively, mercilessly, demanding that the guest answer. 
And this “tougher” version was inserted into the telecast.

An insert was used when the Shah of Iran appeared as a guest.  Wallace 
asked the Shah to defend the brutal practices of SAVAK, Iran’s dreaded 
state-run secret police, and the Shah answered.  He lied, of course, but 
he answered.  Afterward, they reshot the bit, this time with Wallace 
appearing to berate the Shah, bullying him, taking him to task for 
SAVAK’s excesses.

By the time this latter footage was being shot, the Shah was already in 
his limo headed back to the hotel, unaware that 60 Minutes viewers would 
later see Mike Wallace demanding that he come clean on SAVAK.  In truth, 
had Wallace dared use that tone with him, the Shah likely would have 
clammed up….or walked off the set.

Mind you, I’m not putting myself above this stuff.  I read HuffPo.  I 
watch sleaze TV.  Indeed, I can’t wait to learn if Hitler and Eva Braun 
had a bastard love child.  As for Playboy, I’m proud to say I eventually 
outgrew it…..and moved on to Penthouse.

David Macaray, a playwright and author (“It’s Never Been Easy:  Essays 
on Modern Labor”), was a former union rep.  He can be reached at 
[email protected]


        



________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to